2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2018.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehension-based ergonomic redesign of Philippine road warning signs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
12
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two of them are very close to 67.0% standard (Sign no.3 and 19 with comprehension score 66.0%) Considering that 22 out of 37 road warning signs have comprehension score below 67.0%, it is clear that road warning signs in Jakarta are not easily understood by drivers. It is not surprising since similar findings were also found in prior studies (Banares et al, 2018;Choocharukula and Sriroongvikrai, 2017;Yuan et al, 2014;Sodikin et al, 2013;Kirmizioglu and Hasan, 2009;Al-Madani and Al-Janahi, 2002). A low comprehension level, as results of this study, signified that road warning signs in Jakarta are not sufficiently reliable as designed.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Two of them are very close to 67.0% standard (Sign no.3 and 19 with comprehension score 66.0%) Considering that 22 out of 37 road warning signs have comprehension score below 67.0%, it is clear that road warning signs in Jakarta are not easily understood by drivers. It is not surprising since similar findings were also found in prior studies (Banares et al, 2018;Choocharukula and Sriroongvikrai, 2017;Yuan et al, 2014;Sodikin et al, 2013;Kirmizioglu and Hasan, 2009;Al-Madani and Al-Janahi, 2002). A low comprehension level, as results of this study, signified that road warning signs in Jakarta are not sufficiently reliable as designed.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The responses from warning signs test accomplished by 100 respondents were aggregated and presented in Table 2. To calculate the comprehension score, Equation (1) was used in which only the correct number of each sign is considered (Banares et at., 2018;Ben-Bassat and Shinar, 2015). For example the sign number 1, 53 out of 100 participants answered correctly; this corresponds to 53% comprehension score.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations