1983
DOI: 10.1300/j004v02n04_01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Three Treatment Group Formats for Facilitating Social Interaction

Abstract: The study provided descriptive data about the quantity and quality of interaction within three different group formats.The group formats included a parallel task group, a process-oriented verbal group, and .a process-oriented activity group. Structured group observations were conducted using the Bales Interaction Process Analysis method and sociogrammatic representation. The study was conducted on a 16 bed, acute care psychiatric treatment setting.The results substantiate the hypothesis that there is a signifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some measures were formulated or adapted specifically for the study, and only a few were used in more than one study, for example, Goal Attainment Scaling (Eklund, 1999;Hayes, Halford, & Varghese, 1991;Schwartzberg, Howe, & McDermott, 1983) and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (Dobson, McDougall, Busheikin, & Aldous, 1995). Analysis of the outcome measures used highlights a need for sourcing and developing measures that are effective, valid, and reliable in describing and measuring occupational therapy outcomes in mental health (Craik et al, 1998;Department of Health [UK], 1999;Rebeiro, 1998) because the use of tools that lack reliability and validity has implications for the applicability of these studies' results.…”
Section: Reducing Heterogeneity Between Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some measures were formulated or adapted specifically for the study, and only a few were used in more than one study, for example, Goal Attainment Scaling (Eklund, 1999;Hayes, Halford, & Varghese, 1991;Schwartzberg, Howe, & McDermott, 1983) and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (Dobson, McDougall, Busheikin, & Aldous, 1995). Analysis of the outcome measures used highlights a need for sourcing and developing measures that are effective, valid, and reliable in describing and measuring occupational therapy outcomes in mental health (Craik et al, 1998;Department of Health [UK], 1999;Rebeiro, 1998) because the use of tools that lack reliability and validity has implications for the applicability of these studies' results.…”
Section: Reducing Heterogeneity Between Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Narrower studies of outcomes have looked at changes within groups (DeCarlo & Mann, 1985;Nelson, Peterson, Smith, Boughton, & Whalen, 1988;Schwartzberg, Howe, & McDermott, 1982).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factor ''Capability to perform'' (CP) re ects the individual's experiences of his:her own capability to perform an occupation and may be compared with the concrete value according to Persson et al [10]. The individual acquires useful competence to perform occupations, stated as increasing skills by Schwartsberg et al [28] and developing new skills, described as a therapeutic factor by Eklund [11]. The factor ''Challenge'' (Ch) re ects feelings that the occupation may take much energy and be dif cult to perform.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%