2002
DOI: 10.1080/11038120260501217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the Experiences of Occupational Performance Questionnaire: Validity and Reliability in a Sample of Individuals with Severe Mental Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it seems that the authors implicitly presupposed a link between value and meaning, as suggested in the ValMO model. Further, Ivarsson and Carlsson (2002) found the ValMO model useful for explaining factors of an instrument assessing experiences of occupational performance. Future research on the ValMO model may draw upon the instruments developed and the results obtained in these studies.…”
Section: Relationships To Health and Well-being: Validation Of The Vamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, it seems that the authors implicitly presupposed a link between value and meaning, as suggested in the ValMO model. Further, Ivarsson and Carlsson (2002) found the ValMO model useful for explaining factors of an instrument assessing experiences of occupational performance. Future research on the ValMO model may draw upon the instruments developed and the results obtained in these studies.…”
Section: Relationships To Health and Well-being: Validation Of The Vamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The expert group received written information about the questionnaire's basis in a qualitative study and instructions on how to perform the assessment together with an evaluation version of the questionnaire. Each expert rated each statement (n = 82) on a four-point scale (1 = "not relevant", 2 = "in need of revision to be able to fully judge relevance", 3 = "relevant, but in need of minor revision", 4 = "very relevant and concise") (31,36). For the eight items with multiple responses each expert was asked to comment on their relevance in writing.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Content Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%