A Comparison of the Monetized Impact of IQ Decrements from Mercury Emissions

Abstract

ObjectiveThe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reports that the upper bound of benefits from removing mercury emissions by U.S. power plants after implementing its Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) is $210 million per year. In contrast, Trasande et al. [Environ Health Perspect 113:590–596 (2005)] estimated that American power plants impose an economic cost of $1.3 billion due to mercury emissions. It is impossible to directly compare these two estimates for a number of reasons, but we are able to compare the assumptions used and how they affect the results.Data Sources and Data ExtractionWe use Trasande’s linear model with a cord/maternal blood ratio of 1.7 and calculate health effects to children whose mothers had blood mercury levels ≥ 4.84 μg/L.Data SynthesisWe introduce the assumptions that the U.S. EPA used in its Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR) analysis and discuss the implications. Using this approach, it is possible to illustrate why the U.S. EPA assumptions produce a lower estimate.ConclusionsThe introduction of all the U.S. EPA assumptions, except for those related to discounting, decreases the estimated monetized impact of global anthropogenic mercury emissions in the Trasande model by 81%. These assumptions also decrease the estimated impact of U.S. sources (including power plants) by almost 97%. When discounting is included, the U.S. EPA assumptions decrease Trasande’s monetized estimate of global impacts by 88% and the impact of U.S. power plants by 98%.

Global methylmercury exposure from seafood consumption and risk of developmental neurotoxicity: a systematic review

“…As an illustration, we applied a dose-response relationship (0.18 infant IQ point lost for every ppm increase in maternal THHg) 202 that has been used to estimate the economic costs associated with Hg contamination 203,204 to our pooled upper bound biomarkers. The resulting interquartile range of estimated IQ loss spanned from 1 to 13 points for the gold mining, Arctic and coastal subpopulation categories.…”

Benefits of mercury controls for the United States

“…These studies are limited in how completely they have represented physical processes, and how they have accounted for knowledge gaps. First, many do not explicitly consider spatial transport through the environment on a global scale, and so do not explicitly link emissions to exposure changes (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). Timescales associated with bioaccumulation through ecosystems also are often not taken into account, making…”

Collate the literature on toxicity data on mercury in experimental animals and humans (Part I – Data on organic mercury)

“…Griffiths et al (2007), mainly with respect to the economic analysis but also because of the restriction to the Faroe cohort. However, the corrected dose-response slope estimated by Trasande et al is close to that derived by Axelrad et al (2007) on basis of the three most relevant cohorts (Faroe Islands, Seychelles, New Zealand).…”