1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1320-1646(97)70255-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Perimeter and Outdoor Advertising

Abstract: Based on a review of empirical studies, this paper compares the effectiveness of perimeter and outdoor advertising in terms of recall. In a first step, variables influencing the memorisation of perimeter and outdoor advertisers are summarised and categorised. Four groups of variables related to exposure conditions, product, message, and respondent characteristics can be distinguished and are integrated into an information-processing framework in order to explain how perimeter and outdoor advertising work. Conc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While recognizing that all elements of marketing and marketing communications possess different features and capabilities, sponsorship is most often contrasted with media advertising in general (Hastings, ; Hoek et al, ; McDonald, ; Meenaghan ) and indeed with specific aspects of advertising (Olson & Thjømøe, , ; Walliser, ). The comparison of sponsorship and traditional advertising has been previously addressed in terms of a range of discernible differences which included the mutuality of benefit, the consumer interaction process, the comparative nature of the communications process, as well as sponsorship's location at the “leisure end of marketing.” While sponsorship may be different in certain respects, such differences are no impediment to the task of performance measurement and, thus, the “sponsorship is different” argument is largely irrelevant to the need for or ability to undertake proper performance analysis (Meenaghan, ).…”
Section: Is Sponsorship Different?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While recognizing that all elements of marketing and marketing communications possess different features and capabilities, sponsorship is most often contrasted with media advertising in general (Hastings, ; Hoek et al, ; McDonald, ; Meenaghan ) and indeed with specific aspects of advertising (Olson & Thjømøe, , ; Walliser, ). The comparison of sponsorship and traditional advertising has been previously addressed in terms of a range of discernible differences which included the mutuality of benefit, the consumer interaction process, the comparative nature of the communications process, as well as sponsorship's location at the “leisure end of marketing.” While sponsorship may be different in certain respects, such differences are no impediment to the task of performance measurement and, thus, the “sponsorship is different” argument is largely irrelevant to the need for or ability to undertake proper performance analysis (Meenaghan, ).…”
Section: Is Sponsorship Different?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Le parrainage, par contre, est susceptible de surmonter certaines barrières de communication et a des possibilités de sélection des cibles quasi illimitées. Le parrainage et la publicité coïncident partiellement quand les parrains utilisent des panneaux d'affichage ou des supports similaires (Walliser, 1997a). Un autre point intéressant de convergence entre le parrainage et la publicité concerne le parrainage audiovisuel.…”
Section: Différenciation Du Parrainage Des Autres Instruments De Communclassified
“…television, outdoor, etc. The other category, internal factors, is further classified into personal factors (laying a background for consumer segmentation) and advertising message-related factors (Walliser, 1997;Franch et al, 2013). Whereas external context-related factors are harder to control, the advertising message-related factors are the ones that marketers can gain advantages from.…”
Section: Theoretical Substantiationmentioning
confidence: 99%