1998
DOI: 10.1378/chest.113.4.951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of the Availability of Tobramycin for Inhalation From Vented vs Unvented Nebulizers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without a spacer, the deposition will be less, and heavily technique dependent [31]. Pulmonary deposition from dry-powder inhalers is device specific, and breath-enhanced nebulisers deposit much more than unvented ones [32,33]. CFC-free MDIs produce a smaller particle-size distribution and improved (up to 50% of dose) lung deposition compared with those with CFC propellant [34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without a spacer, the deposition will be less, and heavily technique dependent [31]. Pulmonary deposition from dry-powder inhalers is device specific, and breath-enhanced nebulisers deposit much more than unvented ones [32,33]. CFC-free MDIs produce a smaller particle-size distribution and improved (up to 50% of dose) lung deposition compared with those with CFC propellant [34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It might be expected that the model is also valid for unvented ultrasonic nebulizers as the physical principles underlying our model will also pertain to this class of nebulizers. However, the drug output of vented nebulizers is more complex due to the inspiratory flow (Coates et al, 1998b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hudson 1730 Updraft II nebulizer (Hudson, Temecula, California) was not in use in any of the institutions surveyed; however, it was chosen for this study because of its commercial availability. Previous work (2,3,12) with this device indicated that it was a nebulizer of reasonable performance (more than 50% of the output was in the RF [16]). Each of the nebulizers listed above are widely available throughout North America.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reusable breath-enhanced type of nebulizers such as the LC Jet Plus (Pari Respiratory Equipment Inc, Midlothian, Virginia), the LC Star (Pari Respiratory Equipment Inc) and the Medic-Aid Ventstream (Medic-Aid Ltd, Pagham, United Kingdom) have been shown to be more efficient in vitro (12) and in vivo (13); however, they are predominantly limited to home use. This is largely because of the issues surrounding sterilization processes for in hospital use, and the significant cost of these reusable (compared with disposable) devices has led to widespread use of standard disposable nebulizers in hospitals.…”
Section: Modèle : Les Nébuliseurs Hudson 1730 Updraft II Baxtermentioning
confidence: 99%