There is limited information concerning the exercise performance of long-term survivors of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), and much of what is available pertains to those with relatively mild disease. The present study was undertaken to describe exercise responses in patients with a history of severe BPD, defined as those patients with a clinical and radiographic diagnosis of BPD who required supplemental oxygen at least until they were 44 wk postconceptual age and who were discharged home on oxygen. Fifteen children with a history of severe BPD were matched for gestational age with 15 children who had previously had respiratory distress syndrome but who did not develop BPD (Prem). These Prem control children were subsequently compared with 13 healthy control children born at term (Control) who were of similar postnatal age. Participants underwent pulmonary function testing, progressive exercise testing on a cycle ergometer, and a steady-state exercise test with cardiac output determined by CO2-rebreathing. Despite the patients with BPD having a lower FEV1 than those in the Prem group, who had lower values than the Control group (BPD, 64 +/- 21%; Prem, 85 +/- 11%; Control, 95 +/- 8%), the exercise capacity did not differ between the BPD and the Prem and between the Prem and the Control groups (BPD, 84 +/- 15%; Prem, 81 +/- 17%; Control, 91 +/- 12%). However, the BPD patients used a greater percentage of their ventilatory reserve (VEmax/40 FEV1: BPD, 93 +/- 20%; Prem, 67 +/- 12%; Control, 59 +/- 13%). Of the four patients with BPD who had significant oxygen desaturation with exercise, three had the lowest values for FEV1. Cardiac output was appropriate for oxygen consumption in most patients.
The ability to predict drug deposition of inhaled drugs used in cystic fibrosis (CF) is important if there is a need to target specific doses of drug to the lungs of individual patients. The gold standard of measuring pulmonary deposition is the quantification of an aerosolized radiolabel either mixed with the drug solution or tagged directly to the compound of interest. Accuracy of the quantification could be assured if there is agreement between the amount of radioactivity before and after administration. Before administration, the radiolabel is concentrated in the well of the nebulizer, whereas after administration, it is distributed throughout the nebulizer, the expiratory filter and connectors, and the upper airway, stomach, trachea, and lung. Not only is the geometry of the distribution that is presented to the gamma camera different, but there are different attenuation factors for the various body tissues. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the quantification of deposition. Secondary goals were to compare in vitro nebulizer performance with that measured in vivo during the deposition study. Eighty milligrams of tobramycin and technetium bound to human serum albumin was administered to 10 normal adults using a Pari LC Jet Plus (Pari Respiratory Equipment, Inc., Richmond, VA) breath-enhanced nebulizer. Techniques were developed that allowed for the accounting of 99 +/- 2% of the initial radioactivity. The fraction of the rate of lung deposition to total body deposition was the in vivo respirable fraction (0.62 +/- 0.07), which closely agreed with in vitro measurements of respirable fraction (0.62 +/- 0.04). Drug output measured from the change in weight and concentration in the nebulizer systematically overestimated drug output measured by the deposition study. The results indicate that 11.8 of the initial 80 mg would be deposited in the lungs. This technique could be adapted to accurately quantify the amount of deposition on any inhaled therapeutic agent, but caution must be used when extrapolating performance of a nebulizer on the bench to expected deposition in patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.