2016
DOI: 10.1080/07038992.2016.1217485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques Applied to Landsat-5 TM Spectral Data for Biomass Estimation

Abstract: Machine learning combines inductive and automated techniques for recognizing patterns. These techniques can be used with remote sensing datasets to map aboveground biomass (AGB) with an acceptable degree of accuracy for evaluation and management of forest ecosystems. Unfortunately, statistically rigorous comparisons of machine learning algorithms are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the 3 most common nonparametric machine learning techniques reported in the literature, vis., Supp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
43
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
11
43
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-parametric ML models, such as the random forest (RF) model [22,26], artificial neural network (ANN) models [21], Remote Sens. 2020, 12,1334 3 of 24 and support vector machine (SVM) techniques [27], have increasingly been used for mangrove AGB retrievals with different EO datasets due to their ability to produce better prediction accuracies than parametric models. Recently, gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) techniques have been shown to be powerful not only for classification but also for regression tasks, such as soil moisture estimation [28] and forest AGB estimation [29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-parametric ML models, such as the random forest (RF) model [22,26], artificial neural network (ANN) models [21], Remote Sens. 2020, 12,1334 3 of 24 and support vector machine (SVM) techniques [27], have increasingly been used for mangrove AGB retrievals with different EO datasets due to their ability to produce better prediction accuracies than parametric models. Recently, gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) techniques have been shown to be powerful not only for classification but also for regression tasks, such as soil moisture estimation [28] and forest AGB estimation [29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the performance of the SVR model is significantly influenced by the selection of the kernel functions. Therefore, in this research, we selected the Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel because it is the most widely used for determining forest biomass in previous studies [31,32,63]. Consequently, the training of the SVR model required finding the best values for the two meta-parameters, the regularization parameter (C), and the kernel width (γ).…”
Section: Support Vector Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in this work, four state-of-the-art machine learning methods including Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Multi-Layer Perceptron Neural Network (MLP Neural Net), and Gaussian Processes (GP) were used for building AGB models. These machine learning methods were selected because they have proven to be effective for forest AGB estimation in various investigations [30][31][32]. It is noted that the four machine learning algorithms are available at Weka open source software [33].…”
Section: Description Of the Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, numerous EO datasets have been compiled from optical, SAR, and LiDAR data. These data are commonly retrieved from non-parametric regression techniques such as the random forest regression (RFR) algorithm [17,25,27], artificial neuron networks (ANN) [26], and support vector regression (SVR) [28,29]. Recently, gradient boosting decision trees (GBDT) effectively solved regression problems such as evaporation prediction [30] and oil price estimation [31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%