2020
DOI: 10.3390/rs12050777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Mangrove Above-Ground Biomass Using Extreme Gradient Boosting Decision Trees Algorithm with Fused Sentinel-2 and ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 Data in Can Gio Biosphere Reserve, Vietnam

Abstract: This study investigates the effectiveness of gradient boosting decision trees techniques in estimating mangrove above-ground biomass (AGB) at the Can Gio biosphere reserve (Vietnam). For this purpose, we employed a novel gradient-boosting regression technique called the extreme gradient boosting regression (XGBR) algorithm implemented and verified a mangrove AGB model using data from a field survey of 121 sampling plots conducted during the dry season. The dataset fuses the data of the Sentinel-2 multispectral… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
29
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the differences between the AGB and CH prediction accuracies obtained by the two algorithms are small, the XGBoost models outperformed most of the RF models in the prediction scenarios analyzed (Tables 4 and 5). The superior performance of XGBoost when compared with other well-known machine learning algorithms in terms of both accuracy and computational cost has also been observed in other remote sensing studies [30][31][32]61]. Our results highlight the potential of using GLCM-based texture measures (SC3) to achieve enhanced AGB (RMSE = 26.52%; R 2 = 0.65) and CH (RMSE = 20.94%; R 2 = 0.89) prediction accuracies when compared to the use of spectral bands (SC1) or vegetation indices (SC3) as predictor variables ( Table 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the differences between the AGB and CH prediction accuracies obtained by the two algorithms are small, the XGBoost models outperformed most of the RF models in the prediction scenarios analyzed (Tables 4 and 5). The superior performance of XGBoost when compared with other well-known machine learning algorithms in terms of both accuracy and computational cost has also been observed in other remote sensing studies [30][31][32]61]. Our results highlight the potential of using GLCM-based texture measures (SC3) to achieve enhanced AGB (RMSE = 26.52%; R 2 = 0.65) and CH (RMSE = 20.94%; R 2 = 0.89) prediction accuracies when compared to the use of spectral bands (SC1) or vegetation indices (SC3) as predictor variables ( Table 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Machine learning (ML) algorithms are powerful tools to cope with this kind of high-dimensional and complex data [25,26] and have been increasingly used for a wide range of tasks, including pasture monitoring [15,27,28]. The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm, a novel implementation of gradient boosting decision trees [29], has demonstrated excellent performance in many applications due to its high efficiency and impressive accuracy [30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) was also computed in this study because soil brightness at low vegetation cover is correlated with forest structure [52,53]. Importantly, some potential vegetation indices derived from the red-edge bands of S-2, such as the normalized difference index using bands 4 & 5 of S-2 (NDI45), inverted red-edge chlorophyll index (IRECl), and modified chlorophyll absorption in reflectance index (MCARI), have been frequently used for forest AGB estimation in recent studies because of their excellent explanations of the relationship between biophysical parameters and forest AGB [54,55]. We chose a total of 26 predictor features consisting of 11 multispectral bands of S-2 and 8 VIs derived from S-2, 5 variables (HH, HV, HH/HV, HV/HH, and HH-HV) derived from the ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 data and two backscattering coefficients (VV and VH) from S-1 (Table 3) to generate inputs for the mangrove AGB estimation model.…”
Section: Image Transformation Of the S-2 Multispectral And Alos-2 Palmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pham et al [11] investigated the usefulness of gradient boosting decision tree classification approach to estimate Above-Ground Biomass (AGB) of mangrove forests. This study was conducted in Can Gio Biosphere research in Vietnam.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%