1997
DOI: 10.1243/0959651971539812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of linear discrete-time design methods for servosystem control

Abstract: Three linear discrete-time model-based controller design techniques are compared: pole placement, linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) and H I control. It is shown that design choices can be made for all three controllers by considering the effect on the sensitivity functions of the closed-loop system. Also all three controllers can be implemented using an identical controller structure. A comparative study of the application of the techniques to an electromechanical servosystem is made. The controllers are designe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One major difference was that the system was trained online, which allowed the system to adapt to changes in the plant model, therefore increasing the closed-loop robustness. Plummer (1997) compares LQR and H 1 control techniques with particular reference to the output sensitivity over the frequency bandwidth of operation. As LQR is optimized in the time domain, only the average sensitivity can be maintained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One major difference was that the system was trained online, which allowed the system to adapt to changes in the plant model, therefore increasing the closed-loop robustness. Plummer (1997) compares LQR and H 1 control techniques with particular reference to the output sensitivity over the frequency bandwidth of operation. As LQR is optimized in the time domain, only the average sensitivity can be maintained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A paper by Plummer [12] compared the LQR and H ∞ controller techniques. By comparing sensitivity functions in the frequency domain it is explained that as the LQR control method is optimized in the time domain, only the average sensitivity in the frequency domain is minimized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%