2007
DOI: 10.1177/1045389x06068542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced-order Robust Multivariable Control of a Double-beam Cantilever Structure

Abstract: Vibration control of a two-dimensional smart structure is presented. The least squares identification technique and a novel pole identification method are used to obtain accurate plant models. Comparable accuracy is achieved with a significantly lower model order using the latter method. A multivariable multi—input multi—output (MIMO) generalized minimum variance control scheme is used to address robustness issues of plant mismodeling, unmodeled modes/dynamics and control signal saturation. The controllers are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nonlinearity is lumped at six integration points per elements. A wide range of numerical integration options are available in OpenSees to represent distribute plasticity in force-based beam-column elements (Scott, 2007). Gauss-Lobatto type of integration was used in our case in nonlinear beam column element.…”
Section: Nonlinear Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The nonlinearity is lumped at six integration points per elements. A wide range of numerical integration options are available in OpenSees to represent distribute plasticity in force-based beam-column elements (Scott, 2007). Gauss-Lobatto type of integration was used in our case in nonlinear beam column element.…”
Section: Nonlinear Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a most common type of integration scheme adopted for force-based element (Neuenhofer & Filippou, 1997). Gauss Lobatto type integration assigns integration points at the ends of an element section as well where the bending moments are maximum (Scott, 2007). In addition to the material nonlinearity, geometric nonlinearity (P-Δ effect) has not been considered in the analysis.…”
Section: Nonlinear Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%