2001 Proceedings. 51st Electronic Components and Technology Conference (Cat. No.01CH37220)
DOI: 10.1109/ectc.2001.927965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of large I/O flip chip and wire bonded packages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1] Though wirebond packaging has been widely used in previous technologies for low cost markets, current analyses of applications in the 1-10 Gbps range is limited. Whereas wirebond packages are generally believed to have very poor high frequency behavior [2], the performance has not been well quantified. As recent developments reported in industry products, wirebond packages are finding greater potential in high speed applications than previously expected, as demonstrated in [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] Though wirebond packaging has been widely used in previous technologies for low cost markets, current analyses of applications in the 1-10 Gbps range is limited. Whereas wirebond packages are generally believed to have very poor high frequency behavior [2], the performance has not been well quantified. As recent developments reported in industry products, wirebond packages are finding greater potential in high speed applications than previously expected, as demonstrated in [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high I/O count is required for most of the high‐speed ASICs (Bulumulla, 2001) but the traditional packages techniques such as plastic leaded chip carrier (IBM, 1986), thin small outline package (Lau et al , 1993) and the quad flat packs (QFP) (Guenin, 1994) are difficult in fulfilling the requirement. Alternatively, the area‐array solder‐bumped flip‐chip technology (Lau, 1995) is a positive move to resolve this problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%