1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(97)00011-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of fluoride release from various dental materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
22
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…After which, their release amounts fell sharply but they continued to release low amounts of fluoride from day 5 until day 86. This fluoride release pattern also agreed with those described by other researchers 17,18) . The elution of fluoride is a complex process.…”
Section: Fluoride Release Before Naf Solution Treatmentsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…After which, their release amounts fell sharply but they continued to release low amounts of fluoride from day 5 until day 86. This fluoride release pattern also agreed with those described by other researchers 17,18) . The elution of fluoride is a complex process.…”
Section: Fluoride Release Before Naf Solution Treatmentsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In previous studies this dentin bonding agent showed the most satisfactory bonding to root dentin [Ben-Amar and Pilo, 1999] and the least microleakage when tested with a bacteria penetration test [Zivkovic et al, 2001]. In addition, it demonstrated limited effectiveness in preventing demineralization and bacterial growth [Fraga et al, 1996;Park and Kim, 1997;Grobler et al, 1998]; therefore, we considered it the most 'neutral' and 'not masking' any of the processes that occurred in dentin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Expansion due to water absorption is one of the reasons that there is also a decrease in microleakage in compomers. (14,25) Polymerization is associated with contraction and the development of stress, and water sorption may play a role in reducing these stresses. McCabe et al evaluated water sorption of some materials and observed that it is different in each compomer.…”
Section: Conclusion Acknowledgementmentioning
confidence: 99%