Abstract:Studies of Memphis and Three Mile Island have noted a positive association between actual residential distance and public concern about exposure to the potential of contamination, whereas none was found at Love Canal. In this study, concern about environmental contamination and exposure was examined in relation to both perceived and actual proximity to a toxic waste disposal site (TWDS). It was hypothesized that perceived residential proximity would better predict concern levels that would actual residential d… Show more
“…employment (Wiegman et al, 1991), as well as psychological mechanisms, such as cognitive dissonance-reducing heuristics, which increase risk acceptance in long-term residents in contaminated areas (Grasmück and Scholz, 2005). Interestingly, Howe (1988) found that perceived (self-reported) distance from chemical disposal sites was strongly associated with the level of concern expressed by residents, while actual distance was not. Our findings also support that reported traffic intensity is a better predictor of risk perception than living close to major roads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Research on the perception of risk in relation to pollution has produced conflicting results (Howe, 1988;Grasmück and Scholz, 2005;Moffatt et al, 2000;Poortinga et al, 2008). Concern about specific environmental threats is likely to be a local phenomenon, depending on local benefits associated with industrial facilities, e.g.…”
“…employment (Wiegman et al, 1991), as well as psychological mechanisms, such as cognitive dissonance-reducing heuristics, which increase risk acceptance in long-term residents in contaminated areas (Grasmück and Scholz, 2005). Interestingly, Howe (1988) found that perceived (self-reported) distance from chemical disposal sites was strongly associated with the level of concern expressed by residents, while actual distance was not. Our findings also support that reported traffic intensity is a better predictor of risk perception than living close to major roads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Research on the perception of risk in relation to pollution has produced conflicting results (Howe, 1988;Grasmück and Scholz, 2005;Moffatt et al, 2000;Poortinga et al, 2008). Concern about specific environmental threats is likely to be a local phenomenon, depending on local benefits associated with industrial facilities, e.g.…”
“…Perception of closeness to potential contamination sources was a significant predictor of concern in this study. A study comparing the actual distance and perceived proximity to inactive toxic waste disposal sites is reported in another paper where actual distance was not related to concern level, while perceived proximity was significantly related (14).…”
The purpose of this research was to identify the variables that increase concern about the health, environmental contamination, and economic consequences of toxic substances in the environment. A mail survey was sent to a New York State sample, and a 66% response was obtained. Seven indices were developed from specific concerns about toxic substances in the environment including, among others, exposure, health effects, pollution, and economic consequences. Stepwise regression analysis was conducted for each concern index. The results suggest that the number of information sources regarding environmental issues was a strong predictor of concern in nearly all models. Other variables that were repeatedly found to be important contributors to the models were years of education, attitudes about government involvement in private industry, knowledge of epidemiology and the scientific method, and the perceived proximity to sources of potential contamination. Unlike other research, women and mothers of sick children did not make large contributions to the model.
“…This concept of chemical time bombs has emerged in the past few decades through environmental toxicology investigations and results of environmental remediation. Our perceptions of the risk associated with exposures to toxic substances has likewise evolved (Howe, 1988).…”
Section: Alteration Of the Land And Time Scales Of Recoverymentioning
The quality of freshwater at any point on the landscape reflects the combined effects of many processes along water pathways. Human activities on all spatial scales affect both water quality and quantity. Alteration of the landscape and associated vegetation has not only changed the water balance, but typically has altered processes that control water quality. Effects of human activities on a small scale are relevant to an entire drainage basin. Furthermore, local, regional, and global differences in climate and water flow are considerable, causing varying effects of human activities on land and water quality and quantity, depending on location within a watershed, geology, biology, physiographic characteristics, and climate. These natural characteristics also greatly control human activities, which will, in turn, modify (or affect) the natural composition of water. One of the most important issues for effective resource management is recognition of cyclical and cascading effects of human activities on the water quality and quantity along hydrologic pathways. The degradation of water quality in one part of a watershed can have negative effects on users downstream. Everyone lives downstream of the effects of some human activity. An extremely important factor is that substances added to the atmosphere, land, and water generally have relatively long time scales for removal or clean up. The nature of the substance, including its affinity for adhering to soil and its ability to be transformed, affects the mobility and the time scale for removal of the substance. Policy alone will not solve many of the degradation issues, but a combination of policy, education, scientific knowledge, planning, and enforcement of applicable laws can provide mechanisms for slowing the rate of degradation and provide human and environmental protection. Such an integrated approach is needed to effectively manage land and water resources.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.