2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A score for measuring health risk perception in environmental surveys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
16
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[36,37,38], and it is known that females have higher health risk perception than males [39]. In the present study, we found that female residents had higher monitoring prevalence than males after adjustment for covariates in both 2011–2012 and 2013–2014 (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…[36,37,38], and it is known that females have higher health risk perception than males [39]. In the present study, we found that female residents had higher monitoring prevalence than males after adjustment for covariates in both 2011–2012 and 2013–2014 (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The possible relationships between perceived risk, the types of exposures, and the clinical status of the LEOs discussed in this report were not assessed. Validated tools could be adapted to assess LEOs' perceived risk in future investigations of incidents involving exposure to drugs and health effects experienced …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Men also had higher Cs detection rates than women. It is known that women have higher health risk perception than men [32], which could possibly explain why those who have a higher radiation risk perception are more likely to refrain from consuming potentially highly contaminated unmonitored foods (i.e., no radiation inspection), resulting in lower internal contamination levels. Cs detection rates were also associated with post-incident actual lived-at address with those who lived in or outside the neighboring prefectures of Fukushima post-incident were more likely to have lower detection rates than those living within the city.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%