“…This approach saves a lot of work related to configuring the conventional tip-timing solver.Sensors 2020, 20, 68 2 of 18 models for this can be simplistic sine fitting [10] or more complex ones derived from the finite element method (FEM) during the calibration and validation process used with BTT.Alternative methods introduced in the previous decade such as auto-regressive [11], spectral estimation using nonuniform sampling [12], or full-signal analysis using many points per blade pass [13], were too complex or not efficient enough to leave the labs and be widely used by the community. These alternative methods provide little additional capability to the BTT technology but are often revisited by researchers [14][15][16] in the hope of finding methods for in-service blade health monitoring (BHM), where the blade sets are already well understood.A significant number of papers, introducing new BTT models and algorithms such as a new two-parameter plot method [17], convolutional neural networks [18], aliasing reduction [19,20], sparse representation, and compressed sensing [21], were published recently, but they can be applied in real life to a limited extent. Several newly introduced algorithms work well only with simulated or rig acquired data, usually with a single response of the first mode.…”