2016
DOI: 10.1080/01904167.2016.1263323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between different chlorophyll content meters under nutrient deficiency conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have shown that due to high salt concentrations in the root zone, plant leaf micro-morphological and ultra-structural features are strongly altered in both halophytes and glycophytes [117,118]. A variable instrumental response to chlorophyll content has also been reported by Kalaji et al [119] under nutrient-deficient conditions. The ultra-structural alterations may be caused by specific ion toxicity and osmotic imbalance [120].…”
Section: Effect Of Stress On Spad-pigment Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Studies have shown that due to high salt concentrations in the root zone, plant leaf micro-morphological and ultra-structural features are strongly altered in both halophytes and glycophytes [117,118]. A variable instrumental response to chlorophyll content has also been reported by Kalaji et al [119] under nutrient-deficient conditions. The ultra-structural alterations may be caused by specific ion toxicity and osmotic imbalance [120].…”
Section: Effect Of Stress On Spad-pigment Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…CC is closely associated with human perception of the green pigmentation of leaves (Barrett et al, 2010) and is also an important indicator of how plants respond to increasing LI. Both destructive and nondestructive methods are used to measure CC (Kalaji et al, 2016). Destructive measures usually report CC in terms of per weight (FW or DW) or per LA bases (Richardson et al, 2002), depending on the study's objectives.…”
Section: Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because leaf morphology characteristics (e.g., SLA) are unknown, direct comparisons of their CC results are difficult. Furthermore, RCC indices are frequently presented as an alternative to destructive CC measurements due to ease of measurement (Kalaji et al, 2016;Richardson et al, 2002). However, RCC indices also do not account for varying leaf morphology (e.g., SLA) between treatments.…”
Section: Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also not always possible to apply these methods in situ. Alternately, some portable chlorophyll content meters, such as CL-01, SPAD-502, Dualex, and CCM-200, have been used to estimate chlorophyll content [9]. However, light intensity also influences leaf thickness [10], and then it often makes the output of the meter obscure [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%