The identification and mapping of crops are important for estimating potential harvest as well as for agricultural field management. Optical remote sensing is one of the most attractive options because it offers vegetation indices and some data have been distributed free of charge. Especially, Sentinel-2A, which is equipped with a multispectral sensor (MSI) with blue, green, red and near-infrared-1 bands at 10 m; red edge 1 to 3, nearinfrared-2 and shortwave infrared 1 and 2 at 20 m; and 3 atmospheric bands (Band 1, Band 9 and Band 10) at 60 m, offers some vegetation indices calculated to assess vegetation status. However, sufficient consideration has not been given to the potential of vegetation indices calculated from MSI data. Thus, 82 published indices were calculated and their importance were evaluated for classifying crop types. In this study, the two most common classification algorithms, random forests (RF) and support vector machine (SVM), were applied to conduct cropland classification from MSI data. Additionally, super learning was applied for more improvement, achieving overall accuracies of 90.2-92.2%. Of the two algorithms applied (RF and SVM), the accuracy of SVM was superior and 89.3-92.0% of overall accuracies were confirmed. Furthermore, stacking contributed to higher overall accuracies (90.2-92.2%) and significant differences were confirmed with the results of SVM and RF. Our results showed that vegetation indices had the greatest contributions in identifying specific crop types.
The classification maps are required for management and for the estimation of agricultural disaster compensation; however, those techniques have yet to be established. Some supervised learning models may allow accurate classification. In this study, the Random Forest (RF) classifier and the classification and regression tree (CART) were applied to evaluate the potential of multi-temporal TerraSAR-X dual-polarimetric data, on the StripMap mode, for classification of crop type. Furthermore, comparisons of the two algorithms and polarizations were carried out. In the study area, beans, beet, grasslands, maize, potato and winter wheat were cultivated, and these crop types were classified using the data set acquired in 2009. The classification results of RF were superior to those of CART and the overall accuracies were 0.91 to 0.93.
Although classification maps are required for management and for the estimation of agricultural disaster compensation, those techniques have yet to be established. This paper describes the comparison of three different classification algorithms for mapping crops in Hokkaido, Japan, using TerraSAR-X (including TanDEM-X) dual-polarimetric data. In the study area, beans, beets, grasslands, maize, potatoes and winter wheat were cultivated. In this study, classification using TerraSAR-X-derived information was performed. Coherence values, polarimetric parameters and 2 gamma nought values were also obtained and evaluated regarding their usefulness in crop classification. Accurate classification may be possible with currently existing supervised learning models. A comparison between the classification and regression tree (CART), support vector machine (SVM) and random forests (RF) algorithms was performed. Even though J-M distances were lower than 1.0 on all TerraSAR-X acquisition days, good results were achieved (e.g., separability between winter wheat and grass) due to the characteristics of the machine learning algorithm. It was found that SVM performed best, achieving an overall accuracy of 95.0% based on the polarimetric parameters and gamma nought values for HH and VV polarizations. The misclassified fields were less than 100 a in area and 79.5-96.3% were less than 200 a with the exception of grassland. When some feature such as a road or windbreak forest is present in the TerraSAR-X data, the ratio of its extent to that of the field is relatively higher for the smaller fields, which leads to misclassifications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.