Abstract:This research aimed at investigating whether or not there is a different effect between PQRST and SQ3R strategies based on the text types upon the eighth grade students’ reading competency. This research was an experimental research with 2 X 2 factorial designs. The population was 6 classes (179 students) of grade VIII in SMPN 4 Singaraja in the academic year 2012/2013, in which 4 classes were sample of this research which was assigned into two groups, two classes with 60 students were PQRST strategy group, an… Show more
“…Secondly, Sandiarsa et al (2013) found that there was different effect between PQRST and SQ3R strategies on students' reading competency and there was no interactional effect between both methods and text types. It almost similar to the result of this study although this study has different compared method, that was Small Group Discussion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The result showed that PQRST method and CTL approach improve students' learning outcome on chemistry subject about periodic table. On the contrary, Sandiarsa et al (2013) in his comparative research of PQRST (Preview, Question, Read, State, and Test) and SQ3R Strategies based on the text types upon the eighth grade students' reading competency at SMPN 4 Bali, showed that there was different effect between PQRST and SQ3R Strategies on students' reading competency and there is no interactional effect between both methods and text types (narrative and recount on students' reading competency.…”
This research aims to compare the effectiveness of two methods, PQRST (Preview, Question, Read, State and Test) and SGD (Small Group Discussion). It was carried out at the second semester students of Penjaskesrek Department, Dehasen University. The design was a quasi-experiment. The sample consisted of two classes; one was taught by the PQRST method and another by the SGD method. The instrument was a reading test, which was tried-out; the reliability was 0.917 (very high). The result was as follows: at the pretest, there was no significant difference between both group on all aspects and at the post test, there were no significant difference between both groups on general comprehension, reading to learn from the text, and reading to integrate information. However, SGD was found to be more effective on finding general information while PQRST was found to be more effective on reading to skim and finding simple information.
“…Secondly, Sandiarsa et al (2013) found that there was different effect between PQRST and SQ3R strategies on students' reading competency and there was no interactional effect between both methods and text types. It almost similar to the result of this study although this study has different compared method, that was Small Group Discussion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The result showed that PQRST method and CTL approach improve students' learning outcome on chemistry subject about periodic table. On the contrary, Sandiarsa et al (2013) in his comparative research of PQRST (Preview, Question, Read, State, and Test) and SQ3R Strategies based on the text types upon the eighth grade students' reading competency at SMPN 4 Bali, showed that there was different effect between PQRST and SQ3R Strategies on students' reading competency and there is no interactional effect between both methods and text types (narrative and recount on students' reading competency.…”
This research aims to compare the effectiveness of two methods, PQRST (Preview, Question, Read, State and Test) and SGD (Small Group Discussion). It was carried out at the second semester students of Penjaskesrek Department, Dehasen University. The design was a quasi-experiment. The sample consisted of two classes; one was taught by the PQRST method and another by the SGD method. The instrument was a reading test, which was tried-out; the reliability was 0.917 (very high). The result was as follows: at the pretest, there was no significant difference between both group on all aspects and at the post test, there were no significant difference between both groups on general comprehension, reading to learn from the text, and reading to integrate information. However, SGD was found to be more effective on finding general information while PQRST was found to be more effective on reading to skim and finding simple information.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.