2000
DOI: 10.1080/09540100099580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Indirect Competitive ELISA and HPLC for Fumonisin Detection in Corn of the State of Paraná, Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
6

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
18
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A GC method for quantification and confirmation of trichothecenes in wheat (40), TLC systems for the confirmation of trichothecenes (59) and a commercial ELISA kit for AFM 1 in milk (74) were assessed. Comparisons were carried out with ELISA and TLC methods for AFB 1 in samples of corn, feed and peanut (106) and for AFs, OTA and ZEA in corn and corn meal (63); two TLC methods for OTA in green coffee (66); and TLC and HPLC methods for AFM 1 in milk (116) and for FB S in corn (80). Screening methods for AFs in corn and peanut were also evaluated (44,83,119).…”
Section: Analytical and Mycological Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A GC method for quantification and confirmation of trichothecenes in wheat (40), TLC systems for the confirmation of trichothecenes (59) and a commercial ELISA kit for AFM 1 in milk (74) were assessed. Comparisons were carried out with ELISA and TLC methods for AFB 1 in samples of corn, feed and peanut (106) and for AFs, OTA and ZEA in corn and corn meal (63); two TLC methods for OTA in green coffee (66); and TLC and HPLC methods for AFM 1 in milk (116) and for FB S in corn (80). Screening methods for AFs in corn and peanut were also evaluated (44,83,119).…”
Section: Analytical and Mycological Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). This value corresponded to mean absorbance plus three times the SD of the measurements of three replicate wells of 0 ng OTA/mL (Ono et al, 2000). The sensibility of ic-ELISA was adequate for detecting OTA in coffee samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 correlated the data from OTA determination by HPLC and by ic-ELISA. Immunoassay recorded higher values of OTA than HPLC in every kind of coffees tested, indicating either recovery losses during sample preparation in HPLC (clean up step) and/or food matrix effect during immunoassay (Petska et al, 1994;Ono et al, 2000). Ochratoxin levels analyzed by ELISA were 0.66 to 1.46-fold higher than HPLC in green coffee (ELISA/HPLC ratio = 1.02), 0.96 to 1.11-fold in roasted coffee (ELISA/HPLC ratio = 1.02) and 0.93 to 1.82-fold in instant coffee (ELISA/HPLC ratio = 1.24) (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assim, um grande número de amostras pode ser analisado em tempo reduzido e custo relativamente baixo. Estes métodos são promissores devido a sua simplicidade, que permite uma análise rápida para o controle de qualidade tanto no campo como na indústria (PESTKA; ABOUZEID; SUTIKNO, 1995;ABRAMSON, 2000;ONO et al, 2000).…”
Section: Métodos Para Detecção De Fungosunclassified