2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11082-016-0562-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of different metal and prism in the surface plasmon resonance biosensor having MoS2-graphene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Verma et al ( 2015 ) reported that by adding graphene to the gold surface, the sensitivity of the sensor had increased from 30.85 to 33.98°/(RIU: refractive index unit). Similar results were also reported by Maurya and Prajapati ( 2016 ). They compared the sensitivity of SPR on four different structures, namely, bare Ag, Ag/graphene, Ag/MoS 2 , and Ag/MoS 2 /graphene.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Verma et al ( 2015 ) reported that by adding graphene to the gold surface, the sensitivity of the sensor had increased from 30.85 to 33.98°/(RIU: refractive index unit). Similar results were also reported by Maurya and Prajapati ( 2016 ). They compared the sensitivity of SPR on four different structures, namely, bare Ag, Ag/graphene, Ag/MoS 2 , and Ag/MoS 2 /graphene.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, bare Au surfaces are not suitable for the biosensor because of its poor absorbance properties of biomolecules (Wu et al, 2010 ). Therefore, traditional biosensors are not capable to detect low molecular weight of biomolecules because of poor attachment of these biomolecules to the bare metal surface (Maurya and Prajapati, 2016 ). Until now, many methods have been developed to increase the sensitivity of SPR sensor such as using adhesion layer (Agarwal et al, 2016a , b ), metal nanoparticles and nanohole (Prasad et al, 2019 ), metal nanoslits (Yeung et al, 2018 ), and gold nanoparticles (Amendola et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This value of sensitivity is also higher when compared against S B;θ reported in Ref. [50] (MoS 2 -graphene structures), Ref. [51] (ZnO films), and Ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…These values are better than some recent proposals that use graphene [ 28 , 30 , 35 ], silicon nanostructures [ 27 ], dielectric or metallic gratings [ 26 , 29 ], oxide films [ 36 ], and metallic nanoprisms (gold coated over silver nanoprisms) [ 37 ]. When not working at normal incident, some other plasmonic structures, as the gold mushrooms, show a higher sensitivity but a lower FOM [ 38 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%