2017
DOI: 10.1080/0305215x.2017.1359584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of controlled random search algorithms with application to inverse aerofoil design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the inverse design itself (i.e., to find the airfoil shape knowing the velocity distribution), one uses herein an improved version of the controlled random search (CRS) evolutionary algorithm, known as CRS-VBR, proposed initially by Manzanares-Filho et al [18]. The problem is based on a single objective function to be minimized, which represents the differences between the optimized velocity distributions and the velocity distributions for the searched airfoil geometry.…”
Section: Airfoil Inversion Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the inverse design itself (i.e., to find the airfoil shape knowing the velocity distribution), one uses herein an improved version of the controlled random search (CRS) evolutionary algorithm, known as CRS-VBR, proposed initially by Manzanares-Filho et al [18]. The problem is based on a single objective function to be minimized, which represents the differences between the optimized velocity distributions and the velocity distributions for the searched airfoil geometry.…”
Section: Airfoil Inversion Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controlled random search (CRS) and differential evolution (DE) have been successfully used to compute optimal parameters for various nonlinear systems and engineering applications. 37–40 Classical particle swarm optimization (PSO)-tuned PID control has been employed in many control designs. Though it was initially designed for continuous space, it performs well when applied to discontinuous objective functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since inverse optimization requires multiple iteration for small design change, there is not doubt why researchers in this field have favored BEM-PM or similar method. Some of the recent and more significant examples of use of PM for inverse optimization problem of axial compressor and turbine blade cascade optimization are [26,27,28,29]. Moreover, less sophisticated 3D unsteady vortex lattice method (UVLM) type boundary element method were used by [30,31,32].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%