2013
DOI: 10.1111/srt.12014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of colour and perfusion between two different post surgical scars. Do the laser Doppler imager and the colorimeter measure the same features of a scar?

Abstract: Scars closed with higher mechanical force show higher perfusion and prolonged activity; and more redness is associated with more perfusion for both post surgical scars. Nevertheless, there was no consistent correlation found between these parameters making the laser Doppler imager and the Colorimeter still non-replaceable instruments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During measurements of 32 hypertrophic scars, a widespread in erythema values is observed, whereas the accompanying blood flow values are mostly beneath 300 PU and thereby low. These data are in agreement with a previous study, presenting that erythema (measured using the skin-colorimeter expressing L * a * b index values) is associated with blood flow, but this correlation is not consistent at different test moments [4]. As a result, it is concluded that LDI and colorimetry are non-interchangeable measurement tools.…”
Section: Laser Doppler Imagingsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During measurements of 32 hypertrophic scars, a widespread in erythema values is observed, whereas the accompanying blood flow values are mostly beneath 300 PU and thereby low. These data are in agreement with a previous study, presenting that erythema (measured using the skin-colorimeter expressing L * a * b index values) is associated with blood flow, but this correlation is not consistent at different test moments [4]. As a result, it is concluded that LDI and colorimetry are non-interchangeable measurement tools.…”
Section: Laser Doppler Imagingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Besides increased thickness or an irregular surface, the amount of erythema and pigmentation appear to have a major impact on the judgment of scar quality by both clinicians and patients. Moreover, the assessment of erythema could be imperative to predict the end of the remodeling phase [4]. Therefore, color measurements are an essential part of scar evaluation, and the associated measurement outcomes are common parameters in scar research.…”
Section: Erythema and Pigmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter a* represents the spectrum from green to red, with more positive values corresponding to increased erythema. 8,9…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, by directly measuring erythema with colorimetry, blood flow with laser Doppler imaging (LDI), vessels with immunohistochemistry, and subjective scale of redness with POSAS, respectively, Jaspers et al found only significant relevance between erythema and subjective redness, but no correlations between the others. In contrast, Mermans et al found that erythema was associated with blood flow, but this correlation was not consistent at different test moments [9]. Moreover, Kischer et al reported that most microvessels were occluded in hypertrophic scars due to an excessive number of endothelial cells [10,11].…”
Section: Vascularization Dynamically Participates In the Erythema Devmentioning
confidence: 96%