BackgroundOptimal surgical management of digital nerve lesions remains uncertain despite the publication of numerous studies. The purposes of this review were primarily to analyze whether there is a superior surgical technique for digital nerve repair and secondarily to statistically verify the variables to be predictors of sensory recovery.MethodsA literature search was performed using PubMed including citation from MEDLINE. Studies were included if they involved patients with digital nerve lacerations in whom end-to-end neurorrhaphy, nerve grafts, conduits, or end-to-side neurorrhaphy were performed. Further, the sensory outcome had to be assessed according to the modified American Society for Surgery of the Hand guidelines to stratify for two-point discrimination in millimeters. The variables age, follow-up, delay in repair, type of trauma, and gap length were extracted. The association between each predictor and response was assessed using a linear mixed model and corrected for heterogeneity between studies. Significance was considered present at p ≤ 0.05.ResultsOf the 34 articles found, 14 articles were included giving appropriate individual data for 191 nerves. There was no statistically significant difference in outcome between operation techniques. Age and follow-up were verified predictors of sensory recovery.ConclusionIn this review, the type of operation for digital nerve repair does not influence sensory outcome. However, we verified outcome to be influenced by the patient’s age and the follow-up period. To add more scientific evidence to our results, larger cohort prospective studies need to be done with better detailed description of data.
A 24-year-old transgender woman consulted our outpatient clinic with a painful, itchy and red left labia. She underwent a penile inversion vaginoplasty 18 months before presentation. At physical examination of the left labia, erythema, edema and herpetic vesicles with ulceration were observed. A vesicle fluid swab was obtained and the presence of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) was detected by PCR assay. Treatment consisted of oral valaciclovir (500 mg twice daily) for a total of five days.Topically-applied lidocaine cream (3%) was used for pain management. Treatment gave symptom relief in five days. At physical examination 14 days after symptom onset, there were no signs of active infection. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of HSV-1 infection of the neolabia in a transgender woman.
Objective:
Objective evaluation of the efficacy of tongue lip adhesion (TLA) in the management of Robin sequence (RS).
Study Design:
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting:
Tertiary referral hospital.
Patients, Participants:
The craniofacial database of Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam was searched to identify infants with RS who underwent tong lip adhesion (TLA). Forty-one RS infants who underwent TLA from 1993 to 2016 were identified.
Interventions:
TLA.
Main Outcome Measure:
The outcome measures were pre- and postoperative polysomnography results, nutritional status, weight gain, age at operation, hospital stay length, extubation time after TLA, and complications.
Results:
Forty-one RS patients were included who had TLA at an average age of 26.6 days. In 16 cases a pre- and postoperative polysomnography was performed. In 13 of these cases (81.3%) improvement was observed, in 2 (12.5%) the results were inconclusive, and in 1 (6.3%) no improvement was seen. Patients were extubated after a mean of 2.2 days.
The mean hospital stay was 40.2 days. Reintervention was needed in 7 patients because of a wound dehiscence. The mean age of TLA release was 9.7 months. At discharge, 9 (22%) children still needed total nutritional support for persistent feeding difficulties. The average growth from birth to adhesion release was 4.6 kg.
Conclusion:
This cohort demonstrates that TLA is a successful procedure in children with RS in terms of respiratory, feeding, and growth outcome. Only minor complications were seen in our cohort.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.