Middle Powers in Global Governance 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72365-5_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Analysis of China and Turkey’s Development Aid Activities in Sub-Saharan Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, Turkey’s engagement since its strategic foreign policy decision of ‘opening to Africa’ in 2005 has encompassed the exponential growth of investments, trade volume, diplomatic ties, and transport infrastructure (Heibach and Taş, n.d.). Scholars have interpreted Turkey, on the one hand, as a unique needs-driven and counter-colonial aid donor different from both OECD DAC countries or China (Belder and Dipama, 2018; Donelli, 2018; Özkan and Akgün, 2010) and, on the other, as on a ‘neo-Ottoman’, nationalist, normative, and moral quest to carve out a new foreign policy identity for itself as a ‘virtuous power’ in contrast to the European imperial ‘Other’ (Langan, 2017). Still, the literatures on the Gulf states and Turkey have largely ignored their engagement in West Africa.…”
Section: The Saharan Security Threat Global Circulation and Emerging ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Turkey’s engagement since its strategic foreign policy decision of ‘opening to Africa’ in 2005 has encompassed the exponential growth of investments, trade volume, diplomatic ties, and transport infrastructure (Heibach and Taş, n.d.). Scholars have interpreted Turkey, on the one hand, as a unique needs-driven and counter-colonial aid donor different from both OECD DAC countries or China (Belder and Dipama, 2018; Donelli, 2018; Özkan and Akgün, 2010) and, on the other, as on a ‘neo-Ottoman’, nationalist, normative, and moral quest to carve out a new foreign policy identity for itself as a ‘virtuous power’ in contrast to the European imperial ‘Other’ (Langan, 2017). Still, the literatures on the Gulf states and Turkey have largely ignored their engagement in West Africa.…”
Section: The Saharan Security Threat Global Circulation and Emerging ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Türkiye, bu komiteye üye olmamakla beraber gözlemci statüsündedir ve pek çok gündem toplantısına katılmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, Türkiye'nin de dış yardımlar noktasında geleneksel olmayan diğer ülkelerle mukayesesi (Belder & Dipama, 2018;Mehmetcik, 2018;Mesquita & Chien, 2021;Ozkan, 2013;Parlar Dal & Dipama, 2021) ya da geleneksel donörler ile ilişkisi (Cihangir-Tetik & Müftüler-Baç, 2021) dış politika öncelikleri bağlamında karşılaştırmalı analizi mümkün kılmıştır. Bu çalışmalarda Türkiye'nin 2000'lerde artan dış yardım faaliyetleri ve kalkınma işbirliği projelerinin etkileri iç politika, bölgesel ve uluslararası düzeyde tartışılmaktadır.…”
Section: Yükselen Güçler Yeni Donörler Ve Türkiyeunclassified
“…(Şekil 2.) Siyasal, ideolojik ve ekonomik motivasyonlar sadece Türkiye'yi değil, uluslararası alanda etki alanı ve statüsünü yükseltmek isteyen yükselen güçleri de Afrika'da yükselen donörler olarak ortaya çıkarmıştır(Belder & Dipama, 2018;Mehmetcik, 2018).Şekil 2. Türkiye'nin Sahra-Altı Afrika'ya Yönelik Kalkınma Yardımlarının Miktar Olarak Dağılımı (milyon dolar) (1992-2021) (Kaynak: OECD, QWIDS, Uluslararası Kalkınma İstatistikleri, https://stats.oecd.org/qwids/ (Erişim Tarihi: 31.10.2022) Her ne kadar Şekil 2'de asıl sıçramanın 2011 yılında gerçekleştiği ve 2015 yılında Sahra-Altı Afrika'ya yapılan yardımların zirveye ulaştığı görülse de bu yoğunluğun Somali özelinde gerçekleşmesi, Somali örneğini bir sonraki bölüm olan 'odak ülke' bağlamında tartışmayı daha uygun kılmaktadır.…”
unclassified
“…In line with Turkey's foreign policy objectives since the ‘Opening to Africa’, the Turkish government has sought to increase trade and strengthen economic cooperation with African states (Erdağ 2018: 329). To this end, in order to increase its attractiveness, the Turkish government has typically offered incentives such as development and humanitarian aid with no political conditionality (Belder & Dipama 2018: 236), the provision of military support and institutional capacity-building assistance (Erdağ 2018: 323, 333). These incentives have sometimes been effective, especially when they created or increased asymmetrical interdependence in Turkey's favour thereby giving the Turkish government leverage over the relationship.…”
Section: Turkey and Africa: A Transactional Reading Of African Agencymentioning
confidence: 99%