2014
DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2014.936853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comment on Henry Bernstein's way with peasants, and food sovereignty

Abstract: Food sovereignty, as a counter-movement to the food regime, includes a range of struggles, and is evidently quite elastic as a discourse and practice. Because the food regime itself is evolving and restructuring, food sovereignty embodies movement. In its 'second generation' phase it operates on both rural and urban fronts, separately and together, connecting producers, workers, consumers and various activist organizations. Nevertheless, it is important to recognize food sovereignty's origins in the global agr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
24
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These are some of the questions proffered by one line of enquiry that is sceptical about the viability of food sovereignty to feed the whole world (Bernstein ). In response, we concur with McMichael () that to think of the peasantry only as an analytical category is to miss the construction of it as a political category through mobilization. However, we also find Bernstein's questions about how and to what extent socially differentiated producers are able to feed themselves important at the micro‐level, for they can help illuminate the specificity of food sovereignty and the challenges faced in deepening it in incipient contexts.…”
Section: Food Sovereigntysupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These are some of the questions proffered by one line of enquiry that is sceptical about the viability of food sovereignty to feed the whole world (Bernstein ). In response, we concur with McMichael () that to think of the peasantry only as an analytical category is to miss the construction of it as a political category through mobilization. However, we also find Bernstein's questions about how and to what extent socially differentiated producers are able to feed themselves important at the micro‐level, for they can help illuminate the specificity of food sovereignty and the challenges faced in deepening it in incipient contexts.…”
Section: Food Sovereigntysupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Our investigation of the manifestation of food sovereignty in the life of an individual farmer is premised on two theoretical insights. First, the peasantry is a historicized condition (McMichael ). As such the nature, possibilities and limitations of peasant agriculture must be situated in relation to historical processes.…”
Section: Food Sovereigntymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important contribution of the nested markets framework lies in the fact that it does not take the stance or speech of food sovereignty and the need to build an autonomous global food model-as has been advocated by some social movements, such as Via Campesina-capable to develop a new world food order, socially just and able to reconnect nature and society, person, and food [40,41].…”
Section: The Nested Markets' Contribution To Rural Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is a long geneology here, see, for example,Brass (2000) and Bernstein this issue. 2 For notable 'populist' critiques of Marxism, seeShanin (1970) andMcMichael (2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%