2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10207133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Coaxial Dielectric Barrier Discharge Reactor for Treatment of Winter Wheat Seeds

Abstract: Non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasmas have been recently explored for their potential usage in agricultural applications as an interesting alternative solution for a potential increase in food production with a minor impact on the ecosystem. However, the adjustment and optimization of plasma sources for agricultural applications in general is an important study that is commonly overlooked. Thus, in the present work, a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) reactor with coaxial geometry designed for the direct t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
19
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
7
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our plasma source mean electrical power, around 8 W, was close to the values reported by Guo, Lukic, Nishime, Pankaj and Sarangapani (2-20 W) [26,36,[92][93][94], but lower than 20-50 W as reported by Starek, Mujahid, Wang [38,95,96], or less than 50-200 W as reported by Bao, Pan, Zhao, Xiang, Laurita, Sainz-Garcia [29,40,41,43,97,98], and even far less than 300-750 W as reported by Ashtiani, Huang, Fan, Jambrak, Zhou [30,42,44,99,100]. The higher the dissipated plasma power got, the higher the possibility of thermal treatment of the sample was.…”
Section: Plasma Source Electrical Diagnosissupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our plasma source mean electrical power, around 8 W, was close to the values reported by Guo, Lukic, Nishime, Pankaj and Sarangapani (2-20 W) [26,36,[92][93][94], but lower than 20-50 W as reported by Starek, Mujahid, Wang [38,95,96], or less than 50-200 W as reported by Bao, Pan, Zhao, Xiang, Laurita, Sainz-Garcia [29,40,41,43,97,98], and even far less than 300-750 W as reported by Ashtiani, Huang, Fan, Jambrak, Zhou [30,42,44,99,100]. The higher the dissipated plasma power got, the higher the possibility of thermal treatment of the sample was.…”
Section: Plasma Source Electrical Diagnosissupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, the germination and vigor of non-infected barley grains were not significantly affected after plasma treatment. Positive effects of non-thermal plasma application on seed germination (after optimal application doses) have been observed in a great variety of plant species, including monocots,-e.g., maize [34], wheat [30,35] and rice [36]-and dicot plants-e.g., Chenopodium album [37], pea [16,38], soybean [39,40] and tomato [31]. As in our study, the negative effect of high application rates of non-thermal plasma, and in particular, the negative effect of nitrogen as a working gas, has recently been described, e.g., for peas and soybeans [38,[40][41][42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Germination of wheat grains treated with LT 90 's levels of non-thermal APPD showed that the plasma grain treatment for an appropriate time that ranged from 1.9 to 3.1 min (112.55–182.97 sec) improved the germination. Germination acceleration is further enhanced with an increase of exposition time from 11% for 3 min plasma treatment to around 40% for 30 min plasma treatment of germinated wheat grains (Nishime et al ., 2020). A similar result was found in the study of Los et al ., (2018); short plasma treatment had a minimal positive influence on the germination rate of wheat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%