1989
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(89)90293-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A classification of temporomandibular joint disk morphology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
1
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
8
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[20], suggested that over 15 degrees be included in assessing the difference between the inside and the outside of disk position; in addition, over 70 degrees should be included in the category of CA, despite any difference between inside and outside of disk position. In identifying disk deformities in the TMJ, Heffez and Jordan [32] categorized disk configurations as shapes (e.g., bow-tie, straight, funnel, bulge, and Y shapes) using cephalometric arthrograms and histopathologic sagittal sections. Using MRI, Murakami et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20], suggested that over 15 degrees be included in assessing the difference between the inside and the outside of disk position; in addition, over 70 degrees should be included in the category of CA, despite any difference between inside and outside of disk position. In identifying disk deformities in the TMJ, Heffez and Jordan [32] categorized disk configurations as shapes (e.g., bow-tie, straight, funnel, bulge, and Y shapes) using cephalometric arthrograms and histopathologic sagittal sections. Using MRI, Murakami et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such anterior displacement occurs mostly in the anteromedial direction. The anatomic reason for this displacement orientation is the direction of the pull exerted by the lateral pterygoid muscle attached to the anterior joint capsule: in an already affected band complex, the force vector of this muscle, which pulls down the articular disc from the condyle head toward antedient als Kriterium die Relation von der Intermediärzone des Diskus zum anterioren und superioren Pol des Kondylus sowie zum mechanischen Drehpunkt der Unterkieferbewegungen [14,15,35,36]. Beim so genannten "Uhrzeigermodell" wird der Grad der Diskusverlagerung in der jeweiligen sagittalen Schicht bestimmt [51].…”
Section: Disc Displacementunclassified
“…There are many classifications in the literature with which to assess displaced discs: one criterion is the relationship between the disc's intermediate zone and the anterior and superior pole of the condyle, as well as the mechanical point of rotation involved in mandible movements [14,15,35,36]. The "dial-hand model" determines the extent of disc displacement in the relevant sagittal slice [51], taking as anatomic points of reference the articular disc's posterior border and the condyle's greatest superior and anterior circumference.…”
Section: Visuelle Befundung Der Magnetresonanztomographischen Aufnahmenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we found that biplanar was the most common disc configuration in the ADW group in closed mouth position, when the disc was reduced in open mouth position, the disc was then relocated superiorly to the condylar head with biconcave configuration. On the contrary, Heffez and Jordan [] found that biconcave shape was common for both closed and open mouth positions. Moreover, some studies found that biplanar shape could be found in a nondisplaced disc [,].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%