1999
DOI: 10.1093/pa/52.4.688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A clash of cultures? Corruption and the ethics of administration in Western Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…• Countries that are at a level of corruption between the two previous groups -Great Britain, Germany, Austria, Luxembourg, Ireland, etc., (Pujas and Rhodes, 1999).…”
Section: ) Western Europeanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Countries that are at a level of corruption between the two previous groups -Great Britain, Germany, Austria, Luxembourg, Ireland, etc., (Pujas and Rhodes, 1999).…”
Section: ) Western Europeanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stories are especially important for corruption researchers because they contain values -ideas about good and evil, right and wrong. For instance, Pujas and Rhodes (1999) address the report of the Committee of Experts of March 1999 concerning accusations of fraud and nepotism within the European Commission, in which a storyline develops of the crusade of a 'clean north' versus a 'corrupt south'. That three of the four implicated Commissioners were from a 'southern' country (France, Spain, and Portugal) and only one from a 'northern' country (Germany) seemed to strengthen the view.…”
Section: Storylines and Metaphorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is illustrated in the debate over whether southern Europe is more corrupt than northern Europe, based on rankings released by Transparency International's Corruption Perception Index (Pujas and Rhodes, 1999). Thus, in our earlier example, a common way in which the retainer-based system of bureaucratic administration goes awry is by creating a large number of steps that need approval, because each step and each rule provides an opportunity for potential administrative revenue.…”
Section: The Interplay Of Intangible Factors In Defining Corruptionmentioning
confidence: 99%