2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A choice experiment model for beef: What US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

28
356
3
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 549 publications
(419 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
28
356
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…t T } represents the choice occasions faced by respondent i. According to Loureiro and Umberger (2007) [22], the probability of consumer i choosing alternative j can be expressed by the multinomial logit (MNL) model:…”
Section: Methods: Discrete Choice Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…t T } represents the choice occasions faced by respondent i. According to Loureiro and Umberger (2007) [22], the probability of consumer i choosing alternative j can be expressed by the multinomial logit (MNL) model:…”
Section: Methods: Discrete Choice Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In developed countries like the US, it is required to provide country-of-origin of food products such as shells, fresh vegetables, and fruits [17]. Loureiro and Umberger (2007) reported that US consumers were prepared to pay an extra of 1.90 dollars per lb. for the steak with a country-of-origin logo than without [22].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, tenderness (Feldkamp, Schroeder, and Lusk 2005, Feuz et al 2004, Lusk et al 2001, Platter et al 2005, packaging (Menkhaus et al 1992, Harrison, Harstad, andRutstrom 2004), labeling (Loureiro and McCluskey 2000, Lusk and Fox 2002, Loureiro and Umberger 2003, organic production (Boland and Schroeder 2002), and multiple attributes and attribute bundles (Alfnes and Rickertsen 2003, Lusk, Roosen, and Fox 2003, Tonsor et al 2005, Loureiro and Umberger 2007, Parcell and Schroeder 2007, Ward, Lusk, and Dutton 2008, Martinez 2008, Froehlich, Carlberg, and Ward 2009, Hanagriff, Rhoades, and Wilmeth 2009, Abidoye et al 2011. Several of these studies paid special attention to the issue of retail beef product branding, recognizing its importance for product differentiation and for providing purchase cues to consumers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In England, France, the Netherlands and several Nordic countries, a variety of meat products are routinely tracked through some or all of the production process (Loureiro & Umberger 2007). For example, in the Netherlands, Belgium, and France, the Van Drie Group offers consumers the capability of taking an identification code from a veal product, entering it into a query form on a website, and receiving a report showing the animal's farm of origin, date of birth, slaughter date, and various other pieces of information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%