2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1802367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Century of American Economic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rosen's () seminal paper has initiated a lively dialogue regarding stardom and salary structure—stressing that in many professions a relatively small number of people boast prodigious salaries and dominate the field. Since then, the superstar effect has been investigated not only in the economics of sports, but also in the entertainment industry, such as Hollywood economics (De Vany, ), cultural economics (Frey, ), and academia (Azoulay et al ., ; Torgler and Piatti, ), and more generally in winner‐take‐all markets, where a small heterogeneity in performance translates into large reward differences (Frank and Cook, ). Atkinson () also points out: “Consideration of the origins of such fortunes suggests that many are made in ‘winner take all’ markets (as is evidenced by the fact that I am writing this paper using Microsoft Word, not WordPerfect which I used ten years ago)” (p. 25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rosen's () seminal paper has initiated a lively dialogue regarding stardom and salary structure—stressing that in many professions a relatively small number of people boast prodigious salaries and dominate the field. Since then, the superstar effect has been investigated not only in the economics of sports, but also in the entertainment industry, such as Hollywood economics (De Vany, ), cultural economics (Frey, ), and academia (Azoulay et al ., ; Torgler and Piatti, ), and more generally in winner‐take‐all markets, where a small heterogeneity in performance translates into large reward differences (Frank and Cook, ). Atkinson () also points out: “Consideration of the origins of such fortunes suggests that many are made in ‘winner take all’ markets (as is evidenced by the fact that I am writing this paper using Microsoft Word, not WordPerfect which I used ten years ago)” (p. 25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Torgler and Piatti () identified that journal rankings are important in publishing ones research, but so too is how many citations a paper generates.…”
Section: An Empirical Audit Of Australian Economic Papers 1962–2010mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the recent work of Torgler and Piatti (, ) on ‘A Century of the American Economic Review’ as a model, this paper takes a close look at Australian Economic Papers ( AEP ) since its inception in 1962. This paper is a companion piece to an earlier paper by Millmow and Tuck () which conducted an audit of the Economic Record since 1960.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The great game in university life is to publish in top‐ranked journals. Torgler and Piatti () also identified that the other great game is to rank the journals themselves. This is important for academics keen to find the best research outlet in which to project their careers.…”
Section: An Empirical Audit Of the Economic Record 1960–2009mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the recent work by Torgler and Piatti () on ‘A Century of the American Economic Review’ as both model and inspiration, this article takes a close look at the Economic Record ( ER ) over the last 50 years, dating from 1960. Created in 1925 as the flagship journal of the Economic Society of Australia and New Zealand (ESA), the ER is one of the world's prestigious economics journals and was invited to submit its content to the first issue of the Journal of Economic Abstracts , later known as the Journal of Economic Literature .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%