2012 Symposium on VLSI Circuits (VLSIC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/vlsic.2012.6243805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 3.2fJ/c.-s. 0.35V 10b 100KS/s SAR ADC in 90nm CMOS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the balanced state, and . Hence (17) Therefore, the comparator random offset caused by mismatch between M1 and M2 can be derived as (18) Assume mismatch between M3 and M4 is similar to that between M1 and M2, the current difference flowing across M3 and M4 can be expressed as (19) By using the first order approximation of Taylor expansion, (19) can be rewritten as (20) Combining with the transconductance of input-transistors M1 and M2 (21) Then, the input-referred comparator offset due to the mismatch between M3 and M4 can be derived as (22) where . Consequently, random offset caused by the mismatch between M3 and M4 is (23) Similarly, random offset caused by the mismatch between M5 and M6 is (24) where .…”
Section: A Dynamic Latched Comparator Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the balanced state, and . Hence (17) Therefore, the comparator random offset caused by mismatch between M1 and M2 can be derived as (18) Assume mismatch between M3 and M4 is similar to that between M1 and M2, the current difference flowing across M3 and M4 can be expressed as (19) By using the first order approximation of Taylor expansion, (19) can be rewritten as (20) Combining with the transconductance of input-transistors M1 and M2 (21) Then, the input-referred comparator offset due to the mismatch between M3 and M4 can be derived as (22) where . Consequently, random offset caused by the mismatch between M3 and M4 is (23) Similarly, random offset caused by the mismatch between M5 and M6 is (24) where .…”
Section: A Dynamic Latched Comparator Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 20 kS/s, the ADC consumes 38 nW from a 0.6-V supply. The performance of the ADC is summarized in Table III, where comparison with other state-of-the-art SAR ADCs [22]- [26] is listed. It can be seen that the proposed SAR ADC achieves excellent performance despite it is implemented in 0.18-CMOS and adopts the 18-fF unit capacitor.…”
Section: Sar Control Logic Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another technique is known as a generalized non-binary algorithm, where a non-integer ratio of capacitances is not needed [33], [43], [45][46][47], [52], [54], [58], [59], [61], [63], [65], [69]. For example, a non-binary weight such as {128, 46,26,20,14,8,6,4,2,1} instead of the binary weight of {128, 64,32,16,8,4,2,1} was used to obtain 8-bit resolution [69].…”
Section: B Circuit Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most ADCs are required to operate at ultra-low voltage and a low sampling rate of 1 kS/s-1 MS/s in such devices. Simple structure, medium resolution and low energy consumption are the characteristics of SAR ADC, which makes it a popular candidate in various biomedical applications [1][2][3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%