2014
DOI: 10.1109/jssc.2013.2280312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 27% Active and 85% Standby Power Reduction in Dual-Power-Supply SRAM Using BL Power Calculator and Digitally Controllable Retention Circuit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, from (7)(8)(9), it is clear that the charge recycling technique reduces the energy dissipation and this reduces the current leakage during transition modes and reduction in leakage current finally causes the reduction of static power dissipation of the proposed SRAM cell.…”
Section: Energy Saving Ratio and Static Power Dissipationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So, from (7)(8)(9), it is clear that the charge recycling technique reduces the energy dissipation and this reduces the current leakage during transition modes and reduction in leakage current finally causes the reduction of static power dissipation of the proposed SRAM cell.…”
Section: Energy Saving Ratio and Static Power Dissipationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [8], a technique to reduce both the active and standby powers, especially at room temperature, has been discussed. A bit line power calculator is used to adaptively set the cell supply voltage in the active mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional SRAM unit (PKT-RAM-US) is needed for storage of upstream packets. Assuming that PKT-RAM-DS is sized to store the complete payload of one XG-PON downstream frame, the total memory requirement for the XG-PON ONT is assumed to be about 2 Mbits and its total dynamic and static power is estimated to be between 1 and 2 mW [31], which is negligible compared to P daX . SRAM power in the Bi-PON ONT are even lower, because the maximum Bi-PON downstream user size is 8 times lower than that in XG-PON, which would allow for proportional scaling of the FEC-RAM and PKT-RAM-DS sizes.…”
Section: A Digital Power Consumption Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Fig. 3, the type 1 devices perform two detection levels and a Owing to the energy-saving topic, many researches put much emphasis on the power conversion efficiency [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] and standby power losses of converter [14,15]. However, some PDs have low power modes or standby modes and for this reason it may be removed by the PSE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%