2008
DOI: 10.1109/lmwc.2008.2002465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 26–38 GHz Monolithic Doubly Balanced Mixer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 summarizes the measured performance of the Gilbert‐cell mixer and includes other reported performance figures, for comparison. The double‐balanced Gilbert‐cell mixer achieved a wide band, high conversion gain and good linearity and isolation, compared to the figures published for other studies [1–4].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1 summarizes the measured performance of the Gilbert‐cell mixer and includes other reported performance figures, for comparison. The double‐balanced Gilbert‐cell mixer achieved a wide band, high conversion gain and good linearity and isolation, compared to the figures published for other studies [1–4].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…At the front end of the MMW transceiver, the mixer plays an important role in the translation of the RF signals to the IF band. Many studies that have used GaAs pHEMT technology have used small passive mixers [4–6] with good linearity and wideband capability. Some GaAs pHEMT active mixers e.g., distributed mixer [7, 8], or traveling‐wave mixer [9] have been reported to have wideband capability, high gain and good linearity, but their disadvantages are their large size and high power dissipation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the inherent configuration and low parasitic IF inductance, a DBSM has wide RF/IF bandwidths [17,18,19]. A DBSM with a dual balun was reported in [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive doubly balanced mixers (DBM) are usually the mixer of choice because of their superior suppression of spurious mixing products, good port-to-port isolation, wide dynamic range, and no need for DC biasing power [1]- [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%