2003 Symposium on VLSI Circuits. Digest of Technical Papers (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37408)
DOI: 10.1109/vlsic.2003.1221172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 10-mW 3.6-Gbps I/O transmitter

Abstract: The swing at the output of the driver is determined by This paper describes a low-power self-terminated the attenuation of the channel and the sensitivity of the transmitter. A novel architecture is proposed to perform receiver. In this design the target sensitivity of the receiver is impedance matching and channel equalization with low <35mV. The pre-distortion design handles 14dB loss of 6.5 power consumption. The test chip is fabricated using 0.18-pm meters of RG55 or 80 centimeters of FR-4 20 mils PCB at d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before we explain the CI FFE driver, we introduce a current switching (CS) driver to more easily compare the CI FFE driver and a conventional voltage dividing (VD) driver [12]- [14], which is known to be more power efficient than a current mode logic (CML) driver [13]. The VD driver implements the FFE function via programmable resistive voltage divider while the CS driver adds/subtracts currents as shown in Fig.…”
Section: A Voltage Dividing Driver Versus Current Switching Drivermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Before we explain the CI FFE driver, we introduce a current switching (CS) driver to more easily compare the CI FFE driver and a conventional voltage dividing (VD) driver [12]- [14], which is known to be more power efficient than a current mode logic (CML) driver [13]. The VD driver implements the FFE function via programmable resistive voltage divider while the CS driver adds/subtracts currents as shown in Fig.…”
Section: A Voltage Dividing Driver Versus Current Switching Drivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These high losses show the good robustness of the CI FFE compared to other on-chip links [6]- [8]. Additionally, in off-chip links with conventional FFE [11], [12], [15] losses up to 30 dB are typically considered equalizable. Fig.…”
Section: Channel Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When different segments are driven with delayed data, this driver becomes an analog FIR filter [12], which can be used as an FFE. At the link model layer, our tool uses the linearized LCM model as a controlled voltage source with impedance R s and parasitic capacitance C s that captures the transient response of the LCM driver.…”
Section: A Physical Model 1) Circuit Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a shortcoming of the LCM drivers and indicates room for further improvement at the circuit level. Note that in on-chip applications, even with this static power component, LCM drivers are a lot more efficient than high-common mode differential pair drivers [12].…”
Section: Power Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the data rate increases, the inter-symbol interference (ISI) becomes much more sever and the signal equalization of a receiver may not be sufficient to get enough eye opening and the pre-emphasis of transmitted signal level is often required. The pre-emphasis is usually achieved by employing a sub-driver which may increase or decrease the transmitted signal level depending on the pattern [7,8]. The required level of pre-emphasis can be different depending on the channel loss and thus the sub-driver of a voltage-mode driver must have variable strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%