2017
DOI: 10.1109/jssc.2016.2598768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 0.0021 mm21.82 mW 2.2 GHz PLL Using Time-Based Integral Control in 65 nm CMOS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that the circuit is capable of generating a 2GHz clock signal while dissipating only 412µW from a 1.8V supply. This translates to a FoM of 4.89GHz/mW, which compares favourably with other contemporary designs [5], [6]. Fig.…”
Section: Postlayout Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results show that the circuit is capable of generating a 2GHz clock signal while dissipating only 412µW from a 1.8V supply. This translates to a FoM of 4.89GHz/mW, which compares favourably with other contemporary designs [5], [6]. Fig.…”
Section: Postlayout Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…For the case of a high speed clock, for example 2.4GHz for a WiFi carrier, DCOs require similar amounts of power as cross-coupled LC oscillators or PLLbased designs, which usually require several mW. Even in the case of an aggressively scaled low-power PLL circuit [6], the power consumption is still 1.82mW at 2.2GHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensing circuitry is made of an XOR gate whose inputs are the SPADs' anodes. To have identical propagation delays for both inputs, we implemented a 16-transistor XOR gate by splitting each pull-up and pull-down path in two paths, where the transistors' positions are swapped, to guarantee that the output transition always involves the same number of transistors and sees the same internal node capacitances [29]. This solution effectively removes any deterministic skew between the two inputs.…”
Section: A Photodetectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the Ring-VCO based PLL is preferable in applications due to its small area, wide range of tuning property, high insensitivity to magnetic coupling, and easy integration. The poor jitter performance of the Ring-VCO based PLL, however, brings difficulties in providing high quality clocks [6,7,8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%