2008
DOI: 10.1002/asi.v59:3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 437 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A stemming tool 5 is applied to reduce the number of features. We also remove the Turkish stop words (Can et al, 2008) and do lowercasing and noise removal. Here, noise is defined as character sets (for a search query) such as emoticons and punctuation and is removed with simple filtering.…”
Section: Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A stemming tool 5 is applied to reduce the number of features. We also remove the Turkish stop words (Can et al, 2008) and do lowercasing and noise removal. Here, noise is defined as character sets (for a search query) such as emoticons and punctuation and is removed with simple filtering.…”
Section: Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although various phenomena related to trust are mirrored in diverse research fields—leading also to many definitions of trust [18-21]—we consider the common principles of trust when examining the relationship between information seekers and providers. As such, relationships between information seekers (trustors) and providers (trustees or trust objects) [22-25] entail an actual or perceived imbalance in each party’s extent of knowledge. In turn, trusting the information provider requires that the information seeker willingly accepts that he or she can never really know if the information is adequate or whether the provider indeed has more knowledge (uncertainty of trustors [21-23,25,26]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, the research on seekers’ evaluation of Web-based information has shown that several factors, such as the information source, the content of the information, and the type of media, are important when people evaluate the credibility of Web-based information in general [28-32]. Regarding health information specifically, the kind of criteria that people use to judge the credibility of Web-based health information is often related to the characteristics of the Web-based information and the provider of the Web-based information [16,22]. Although people’s judgments of a provider’s trustworthiness correspond to judgments about the credibility of information and vice versa [33], single factors, such as the provider’s language and the content of information, seem to influence information seekers’ evaluations of the information and the provider in different ways [34,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%