2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2018.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving educational web search for question-like queries through subject classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Collins‐Thompson et al (2011) proposed to personalize Web search results by re‐ranking them with respect to the reading difficulty. More recently, Yilmaz, Ozcan, Altingovde, and Ulusoy (2019) proposed an approach in which they trained classifiers using various educational resources to predict the course category of question‐like queries, and then employed these predictions as a signal for re‐ranking the initial query results. Both works customized the final result list w.r.t.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collins‐Thompson et al (2011) proposed to personalize Web search results by re‐ranking them with respect to the reading difficulty. More recently, Yilmaz, Ozcan, Altingovde, and Ulusoy (2019) proposed an approach in which they trained classifiers using various educational resources to predict the course category of question‐like queries, and then employed these predictions as a signal for re‐ranking the initial query results. Both works customized the final result list w.r.t.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…User Dimension PK (Lu and Hsiao, 2017), (Taibi et al, 2017), (Syed and Collins-Thompson, 2018), (Syed and Collins-Thompson, 2016), (Jansen et al, 2009), (Yu et al, 2018), (Al-Tawil et al, 2019), (Rieh et al, 2012), (Sendurur et al, 2019) (Tibau et al, 2018), (Azpiazu et al, 2017), (Karanam and van Oostendorp, 2016), (Wilson et al, 2016), (Crescenzi, 2016), (Mao et al, 2016), (Bhattacharya and Gwizdka, 2019), (Ibieta et al, 2019), (Biletskiy et al, 2009), (Pereira et al, 2019) DI (Taibi et al, 2017), (Azpiazu et al, 2017), (Ibieta et al, 2019), (Yilmaz et al, 2019), (Biletskiy et al, 2009), (Lu and Hsiao, 2017), (Moraes et al, 2018) Interaction Dimension ESA (Tibau et al, 2018), (Lu and Hsiao, 2017), (Moraes et al, 2018), (Ghosh et al, 2018), (Bhattacharya and Gwizdka, 2019), (Yu et al, 2018), (Ibieta et al, 2019), (Vakkari et al, 2019), (Biletskiy et al, 2009) AV (Bhattacharya and Gwizdka, 2019), (Yu et al, 2018), (Rieh et al, 2012), (Karanam and van Oostendorp, 2016), (Ibieta et al, 2019),…”
Section: Dimension Variables Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conforme apresentado por Yilmaz et al (2019), para que seja possível prover uma ordenação de conteúdo específico para a educação, são necessários dois passos: a classificação da busca pelo tipo de consulta (intenção de aprendizado) e a arrumação do conteúdo recuperado (feita a partir dos critérios de relevância, foco deste trabalho). Objetos educacionais podem ser ordenados através de estratégias enquadradas em três categorias (Ochoa e Duval, 2008): por similaridade textual, por perfil de usuário e por revisão humana.…”
Section: Trabalhos Relacionadosunclassified