2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1010306103643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: We examined the response of the widely used Folin-Denis assay to purified tannins from 16 woody plant species and to three commercial polyphenol preparations often used as standards. The reagent's response to these chemical mixtures differed significantly among sources (tree species, commercial preparations) and sampling dates, even though the mixtures contained the same total dry weight of tannins. Response to commercial standards usually did not resemble response to actual plant tannin and produced estimates… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total flavonoid compounds were also estimated in the same extracts at absorbance 320 nm (Fukumoto and Mazza 2000; Shao et al 2008). The concentration of total redox-reactive phenolics present in leaf extracts was determined using the Folin-Denis assay, with standard curves developed using chlorogenic and gallic acids, and standards purified from each treatment group (Appel et al 2001). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total flavonoid compounds were also estimated in the same extracts at absorbance 320 nm (Fukumoto and Mazza 2000; Shao et al 2008). The concentration of total redox-reactive phenolics present in leaf extracts was determined using the Folin-Denis assay, with standard curves developed using chlorogenic and gallic acids, and standards purified from each treatment group (Appel et al 2001). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crude fractions were purified and the components were isolated. The structures of the isolated components were determined using JMN-NMR 400 MHz and HPLC (Instrument: HITACHI HPLC D-7000 series, column: Cosmosil 5C18-AR-II Waters 4.6ϫ150 mm, mobile 14) and the content was calculated as the (ϩ)-catechin equivalent in the extract. Amino acid analysis was performed using by model L-8500A Hitachi high-speed amino acid analyzer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many chemically similar compounds interfere with the test results. The selection of standards for calibration is critical because the reduction of F-C reagent by the standard and the phenolics in sample are comparable only if they are chemically very close [23]. Different standards such as gallic acid, ferulic acid, chlorogenic acid, vanillic acid, and catechol are being used by researchers, which generate different calibration curves and results in different numeric values of phenolics content of the same test sample [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%