2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1010646225929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, after prolonged exposure (days to weeks) to increased CO 2 concentrations, the stimulation of photosynthesis slows down and the crop yield stagnates. Accordingly, the weaker growth and yield estimations of particularly N-deficient C 3 plants, as well as wheat crops, due to down-regulation of photosynthesis under increased CO 2 have been documented (Drake et al 1997;Wall et al 2000). The inhibition of N assimilation under increased CO 2 , suggesting a decline in shoot N, was also reported recently (Bloom et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, after prolonged exposure (days to weeks) to increased CO 2 concentrations, the stimulation of photosynthesis slows down and the crop yield stagnates. Accordingly, the weaker growth and yield estimations of particularly N-deficient C 3 plants, as well as wheat crops, due to down-regulation of photosynthesis under increased CO 2 have been documented (Drake et al 1997;Wall et al 2000). The inhibition of N assimilation under increased CO 2 , suggesting a decline in shoot N, was also reported recently (Bloom et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This is further proved by significant correlation coefficient values of different physiological parameters of O 3 -exposed plants upon N amendments (Tables 2, 3). Increased g s upon N amendments have been reported in wheat (Wall et al, 2000), larch (Mao et al, 2014), cluster bean (Gupta and Tiwari, 2020), etc. A decrease in g s along with an increased A upon N amendments and O 3 exposure in poplar has been reported by Zhang et al (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mini-FACE systems as small as 1 m diameter have been developed (Miglietta et al 1996), but they do not escape many of the problems of enclosures outlined above. For example, substantial differences in the photosynthetic response of wheat to elevated [CO 2 ] were observed in a mini-FACE (Miglietta et al 1996) versus a full-size FACE system (Nie et al 1995a,b;Wall et al 2000). This review is therefore limited to full-size FACE systems of more than 8 m diameter plots and with the five major food crops at the global scale; i.e.…”
Section: Free-air Concentration Enrichmentmentioning
confidence: 99%