1999
DOI: 10.1023/a:1018822800063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means, writing practice and context are the main variables that affect EFL learners' coherence development in written texts (Carli, 1999;Carothers & Allen, 1999). This reason might stand behind the favorability of female graduates revealed in this study rather than their gender.…”
Section: Coherence Development Differences In Male and Female Graduatesmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means, writing practice and context are the main variables that affect EFL learners' coherence development in written texts (Carli, 1999;Carothers & Allen, 1999). This reason might stand behind the favorability of female graduates revealed in this study rather than their gender.…”
Section: Coherence Development Differences In Male and Female Graduatesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Wenjing, 2012), and hedges than males. However, many studies (e.g., Carli, 1999;Carothers & Allen, 1999;Lamude, 1993) showed that language use differences are not attributed to gender differences but to contexts. That is, when women show a supportive view on a certain topic, they display apparent coherence showing the feature of repetition exhibiting syntactic, lexical, and semantic repetitions to develop solidarity with readers (Coates, 1996).…”
Section: Gender Differences In Coherencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also crucial to highlight that earlier studies investigate the intersection of gender and influence tactics (e.g. inspirational appeal, rational persuasion, consultation, ingratiation, personal appeals, exchange, coalition tactics, legitimating tactics, pressure) have leaded in mixed results (Carli, 1999;Carothers & Allen, 1999;DuBrin, 1991;Lamude, 1993;White, 1988;Yukl & Chavez, 2002). For instance, male appear to employ influence approaches such as personal appeal, consultation, and assertiveness, while female apply strategies such as consultation, inspirational appeal, and ingratiation more with other women and exchange tactics with male (Carli, 1999;Carothers & Allen, 1999;Dubrin, 1991;Lamude, 1993;White, 1998).…”
Section: Gender Inequality In Satisfactory Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…inspirational appeal, rational persuasion, consultation, ingratiation, personal appeals, exchange, coalition tactics, legitimating tactics, pressure) have leaded in mixed results (Carli, 1999;Carothers & Allen, 1999;DuBrin, 1991;Lamude, 1993;White, 1988;Yukl & Chavez, 2002). For instance, male appear to employ influence approaches such as personal appeal, consultation, and assertiveness, while female apply strategies such as consultation, inspirational appeal, and ingratiation more with other women and exchange tactics with male (Carli, 1999;Carothers & Allen, 1999;Dubrin, 1991;Lamude, 1993;White, 1998). These gender dissimilarities associated with some influence tactics might have been responsible for a significant difference average satisfactory level towards service procedures conducted by BMA employee.…”
Section: Gender Inequality In Satisfactory Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%