Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While focusing on women's household use of water has resulted in some allocation of water for domestic use and women's participation on WUAs, it obscures the fact that women 'almost everywhere use water both for productive and domestic purposes' (Zwarteveen, 1997(Zwarteveen, , p. 1337. These findings echo those of other researchers who emphasize that informal means for obtaining irrigation services are less secure because they rely on the discretion of pump operators, or on the agency and assertiveness of individual women irrigators (Meinzen-Dick & Zwarteveen, 1998).…”
Section: Participation In Wuassupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While focusing on women's household use of water has resulted in some allocation of water for domestic use and women's participation on WUAs, it obscures the fact that women 'almost everywhere use water both for productive and domestic purposes' (Zwarteveen, 1997(Zwarteveen, , p. 1337. These findings echo those of other researchers who emphasize that informal means for obtaining irrigation services are less secure because they rely on the discretion of pump operators, or on the agency and assertiveness of individual women irrigators (Meinzen-Dick & Zwarteveen, 1998).…”
Section: Participation In Wuassupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Although women's roles in water management are better recognized today, perhaps because of over four decades of research and scholarship on gender and development, gender issues continue to 'remain under-theorized and marginal in much water literature' (Laurie, 2011, p. 172-173). Meinzen-Dick & Zwarteveen (1998) call for detailed and comparative research in different world regional contexts on the major factors that affect women's participation in irrigation management and control over irrigation resources. They emphasize that it is particularly important to ensure equitable participation of women in irrigation since control of water resources is increasingly being transferred from centralized entities such as water boards and utilities to community institutions such as local WUAs.…”
Section: Irrigation Gender Norms Technologies and Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But beyond a shared requisite for water, the organizational label of "Water Users' Association" indicates very little about the qualities of would-be members, suggesting an inclusive design wherein all those who use water in pursuit of life or livelihood are eligible to participate and benefit through collective action. Grounded in dominant development theory and a belief in the ability of participatory, locally-based projects to empower without exception and equitably distribute resources, the enthusiastic introduction of WUAs has continued despite a rich body of literature arguing that these anticipated outcomes often fail to manifest [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The continued popularity of "participatory" natural resource management organizations signals that even with decades of critique, this area of study should not be seen as saturated but rather as warranting sustained attention to the variegated ways projects may perpetuate uneven power relations across the globe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factors explaining this include a lack of experience in a specific field, low levels of education, specific rules that exclude women, and institutional factors ranging from norms and values to local social and political structures (Meinzen-Dick and Zwarteveen 1998;Agarwal 2001;Zwarteveen and Meinzen-Dick 2001;Schreiner et al 2004;Singh 2008, 936). For example, Meinzen-Dick and Zwarteveen show that female participation in Asian water users' associations is much lower and ranges between zero and 15%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%