2011
DOI: 10.1109/jssc.2011.2131730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

7.4 Gb/s 6.8 mW Source Synchronous Receiver in 65 nm CMOS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the JTB of an ILO depends strongly on clock deskew, making it difficult to achieve both the optimal JTB and optimal deskew simultaneously [6]. To solve this problem, multiplying ILO (MILO)-local ILO (LILO) [8] and ILO with a JTB interpolator [9] are presented.…”
Section: Architecture Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the JTB of an ILO depends strongly on clock deskew, making it difficult to achieve both the optimal JTB and optimal deskew simultaneously [6]. To solve this problem, multiplying ILO (MILO)-local ILO (LILO) [8] and ILO with a JTB interpolator [9] are presented.…”
Section: Architecture Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main advantages of forwarded clock architectures is that the clock and data channels are clocked by the same transmit oscillator, and therefore, some of the jitter is correlated and tracks each other. However, on one hand, due to the delay mismatch between the clock and data channels, high frequency jitter will become harmful, because clock and data will be eventually out-of-phase [6], [19], which means ILO bandwidth should be low enough so as not to track high frequency jitter. On the other hand, since ILO is like a first-order PLL, it will low-pass filter the noise from the injection clock, and high-pass filter the noise from itself [5].…”
Section: B Trade-offs In Forwarded-clock Architecture Using Ilomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, ILO bandwidth should also be high enough to suppress the phase noise from itself. In practical designs, this direct trade-off leads to ILO bandwidth in the range of several ten to several hundred MHz [5], [6], depending on different environment or applications.…”
Section: B Trade-offs In Forwarded-clock Architecture Using Ilomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The MIPI-DigRF M-PHY should be operated in 3 symbol interval (SI) training time which is very short compared with other interfaces such as display port [4][5][6][7]. The length of the SYNC pattern is 3 SI (= 30 UI (unit intervals)), which is 0.01 μs in HS-G2B mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%