2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2878100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4W1H in IoT Semantics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, ranking knowledge in IoE sensors is a matter of eliciting the main characteristics in IoE applications. In order to understand the IoE domain, we applied specific questions by answering the 4 ws (what, when, who, and where) and 1 h (how) identified using the 4W1H methodology [ 91 , 92 ]. This methodology addresses the challenge imposed due to the high heterogeneity of existing IoE devices.…”
Section: Proposed Ioe Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, ranking knowledge in IoE sensors is a matter of eliciting the main characteristics in IoE applications. In order to understand the IoE domain, we applied specific questions by answering the 4 ws (what, when, who, and where) and 1 h (how) identified using the 4W1H methodology [ 91 , 92 ]. This methodology addresses the challenge imposed due to the high heterogeneity of existing IoE devices.…”
Section: Proposed Ioe Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deployment of IoE applications in real-world scenarios creates a massive amount of data from real-time interactions, usually at high data rates. It faces challenges as temporal data consistency related to the coherency between the value of the data in the system and its environment state [ 107 ]; and high latency during interactions [ 39 ], when inferred contexts evolve with time [ 91 , 94 ], and the exchanged data may not be accurate.…”
Section: Proposed Ioe Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The framework takes as input the ontologies associated with the target use case, which relate to (see § IV for detail): (i) the physical entities, (ii) the cyber entities used for sensing and actuation, and (iii) the constraints and optimization parameters for the IoT system. The ontologies leverage as much as possible existing standards (see [18] for a survey). In particular, there exist various ontology standards for characterizing application domains as well as IoT networks.…”
Section: The Lattice Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we sketch in Section I, leveraging the ontology-based formalization of the physical and cyber entities composing an IoT system is a classical approach to overcome the heterogeneity of the Things. As such, and although this is beyond the scope of this paper, the LATTICE framework may exploit existing ontologies [18], while the characterization of data flows follows from state of the art programming models associated with edge-based IoT systems [29].…”
Section: Characterizing the Problem Space Using Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation