3D clipping algorithm for feature mapping across domains

Subramani, Siddharth; Nalluri, S. R. P. Rao; Gurumoorthy, B.

doi:10.1016/j.cad.2003.08.002

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, they assumed that part designs are created using only subtractive features, which can be regarded as primitive machining features. To convert protruding feature models to negative feature models, Gurumoorthy et al used a clipping and classification method (Subramani et al 2004;Subramani and Gurumoorthy 2005). They consider only geometric relations between feature models.…”

Section: Feature Conversionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Paradigm shift: unified and associative feature-based concurrent and collaborative engineering

Chen

Thimm

2008

J Intell Manuf

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With widely used concurrent and collaborative engineering technologies, the validity and consistency of product information become important. In order to establish the state of the art, this paper reviews emerging concurrent and collaborative engineering approaches and emphasizes on the integration of different application systems across product life cycle management (PLM) stages. It is revealed that checking product information validity is difficult for the current computer-aided systems because engineering intent is at best partially represented in product models. It is also not easy to maintain the consistency among related product models because information associations are not established. The purpose of this review is to identify and analyze research issues with respect to information integration and sharing for future concurrent and collaborative engineering. A new paradigm of research from the angle of feature unification and association for product modeling and manufacturing is subsequently proposed.Keywords Concurrent and collaborative engineering · Feature-based design and manufacturing · Product life cycle modeling · Information validity and consistency

show abstract

Section: Feature Conversionmentioning

confidence: 99%