Maintaining associativity between form feature models

Subramani, Siddharth; Gurumoorthy, B.

doi:10.1016/j.cad.2004.12.007

Cited by 12 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…De Martino et al [7] propagate modifications from one view to another. Subramani and Gurumoorthy [8] used volumetric intersections to propagate geometric feature modifications. They only explored the geometric relations between feature models.…”

Section: Related Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Change propagation algorithm in a unified feature modeling scheme

Chen

Thimm

2008

Computers in Industry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Related Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Change propagation algorithm in a unified feature modeling scheme

Chen

Thimm

2008

Computers in Industry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Interoperability problems arise among different classifications, because the semantics of the represented notions changes. A hole as a functional feature, for instance, is meant as a void space in a product, sometimes called a negative volume [69]. It is because of a void that an assembly functionality can be attributed to a hole used to accommodate a screw.…”

Section: An Overview Of Existing Feature Definitionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

What are features? An ontology-based review of the literature

Sanfilippo

Borgo²

2016

Computer-Aided Design

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Chen and Hoffmann [5] studied the feature editability and reevaluation problem using persistent name matching techniques. Feature propagation, association and mapping across domains are studied in [9], [25]. Although different feature representation and manipulation techniques have been proposed, they are exclusively used in some specified scenarios.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Semantic Feature Model in Concurrent Engineering

Liu

Lai

Dai

et al. 2010

IEEE Trans. Automat. Sci. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Concurrent engineering (CE) is a methodology applied to product lifecycle development so that high quality, well designed products can be provided at lower prices and in less time. Many research works have been proposed for efficiently modeling of different domains in CE. However, an integration of these works with consistent data flow is absent and still in great demand in industry. In this paper, we present a generic integration framework with a semantic feature model for knowledge representation and reasoning across domains in CE. An implementation of the proposed semantic feature model is presented to demonstrate its advantage in knowledge representation by feature transformation across domains in CE.Note to Practitioners-In this paper, an important problem in manufacturing industry is addressed: how semantic features can be used across different domains in CE. The proposed hierarchical feature model in this paper offers a solution to two aspects in this problem: (a) how to capture the specific knowledge consistently in different domains and (b) how to reuse the existing data. The presented modeling approach is an attempt that uses a semantic feature language representation in CE and sheds some light on a practical solution to this difficult problem in industry.

show abstract

Maintaining associativity between form feature models

Cited by 12 publications

References 21 publications

Change propagation algorithm in a unified feature modeling scheme

Change propagation algorithm in a unified feature modeling scheme

What are features? An ontology-based review of the literature

A Semantic Feature Model in Concurrent Engineering

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About