2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2021.101260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature-based ontological framework for semantic interoperability in product development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, ontology has been adopted for modelling knowledge related to product design to enable knowledge reuse and information sharing between different applications [16][17][18][19]. Also, TSAG is an important area of computer-aided design [12].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, ontology has been adopted for modelling knowledge related to product design to enable knowledge reuse and information sharing between different applications [16][17][18][19]. Also, TSAG is an important area of computer-aided design [12].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontologies, as conceptual explicit specifications, are known for their ability to explicitly represent and exchange data semantics [20,21] and play an important role in information sharing, application integration, interoperability implementation and knowledge reuse [18]. They are increasingly being used in the product development process to share data and enable interoperability between heterogeneous product design software [17].…”
Section: Application Of Ontology In the Field Of Product Design Toler...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the model helps continuously monitor a person's emotional outbursts from a neutral to a happy state and vice versa. The semantically interoperable property makes the model more competent [23][24][25][26]. It helps to analyze the overall activity of a person in their several social channels.…”
Section: Proposed Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It enhanced the ability to perform analysis and modeling tasks and achieve matching queries of the components of the 3D model [21]. Gupta and others developed shape ontology, established the equivalence relation between the surface features such as concave, convex, and saddleshape extracted from the CAD free-form surface model and semantics, and realized the semantic interoperability of the production parts [14]. It can be seen that more advanced semantic processing is inseparable from extracting meaningful parts or significant areas of the 3D model, but it is difficult to fully automate advanced semantic annotation.…”
Section: Semantic Annotation Of a 3d Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to their domain ontology to define advanced semantic terms [12]. Gupta et al extracted concave, convex, saddle-shaped, and other surface features from CAD models and developed shape ontology to realize the equivalence relation between surfaces and semantics and to support the semantic interoperability of the production parts [13,14].The first and second knowledge extraction methods start from human natural language or are implemented by human operation, and the extracted knowledge is closer to the daily knowledge shown by the high-level attained.The third method starts from the features of the image or 3D model itself and maps them to high-level semantics, extracting knowledge that is closer to the underlying shape-space knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%