2022
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2022.2103818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D building metrics for urban morphology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Peters et al (2022) propose a methodology that enables the reconstruction of the 3D models formatted in CityJSON and they create the CityJSON files for 10 million buildings in the Netherlands using the proposed methodology. Labetski et al (2023) provide an approach that measures the morphology of the urban areas in 3D and create the open dataset containing CityJSON files that encompass 3D metrics that are calculated by using the provided approach. Biljecki (2020) analyses the current status regarding the generation of 3D building models by using the OpenStreetMap data in Southeast Asia.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Peters et al (2022) propose a methodology that enables the reconstruction of the 3D models formatted in CityJSON and they create the CityJSON files for 10 million buildings in the Netherlands using the proposed methodology. Labetski et al (2023) provide an approach that measures the morphology of the urban areas in 3D and create the open dataset containing CityJSON files that encompass 3D metrics that are calculated by using the provided approach. Biljecki (2020) analyses the current status regarding the generation of 3D building models by using the OpenStreetMap data in Southeast Asia.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Labetski et al. (2023) provide an approach that measures the morphology of the urban areas in 3D and create the open dataset containing CityJSON files that encompass 3D metrics that are calculated by using the provided approach. Biljecki (2020) analyses the current status regarding the generation of 3D building models by using the OpenStreetMap data in Southeast Asia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAR data has been also used to derive building properties using side-looking, interferometric or tomographic sensors (Esch et al, 2020;Sun, Hua, Mou, & Zhu, 2019;Sun et al, 2022). Furthermore, LiDAR have been widely applied, due to its accuracy and resolution, to model individual 3D building properties gaining in detail with higher point densities (Priestnall, Jaafar, & Duncan, 2000;Labetski, Vitalis, Biljecki, Arroyo Ohori, & Stoter, 2022;Peters, Dukai, Vitalis, van Liempt, & Stoter, 2022) and characterize urban form (Bonczak & Kontokosta, 2019;Zhao et al, 2019). A current trend in the extraction of 3D urban form consists on combining remote sensing datasets with ancillary data to improve feature extraction (Esch et al, 2020;Li et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical urban form is not the only aspect of urban morphology, which has a complex conception that varies between authors including distinct aspects such as physical form, land use and activities or function, between others (Kropf, 2017). Physical built form, hereinafter referred as urban form, can be expressed using different indicators (Moudon, 1997;Peters et al, 2022), and with different levels of detail (Chen et al, 2020;Labetski et al, 2022). In this manuscript, we analyse the changes in urban form based on two main simple indicators (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building height estimation and 3D urban buildings construction at a local scale (i.e., the city scale) or on a large scale (i.e., the national scale and continental scale) are trending topics currently, which have obtained fruitful achievements and further provide solid basic data for the following 3D urban morphology and structure research (Dehbi et al., 2017; Frantz et al., 2021; He et al., 2023; Huang et al., 2022; Ochmann et al., 2019; Park & Guldmann, 2019). On the basis of building footprint and height, a number of studies have looked into 3D urban morphology analysis by building metrics (Labetski et al., 2023). Average height indicator, the mean value of all buildings in a spatial statistical unit, and other 3D building metrics have been widely utilized to describe the 3D urban morphological characteristic and further to explore its influence to the urban environment including urban heat island and PM 2.5 , among others (Cai et al., 2022; Wu, Yu, et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%