Using feeding to reduce pain during vaccination of formula-fed infants: a randomised controlled trial

Bos-Veneman, Netty G P; Otter, Marrit; Reijneveld, Sijmen A.

doi:10.1136/archdischild-2017-313488

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) and FLACC scale were used to evaluate the infants. The outcome shows that infants born with fullterm, who were formula fed had experienced reduced pain during vaccination in the recovery phase [9].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Selected Distraction Techniques to Alter Pain Responses among Children Receiving Immunization

Lalzampuii

Maurya

2021

JPRI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Immunization plays a vital role in global health for children. Children should have taken routine immunization universally for the prevention of diseases. While receiving immunization, most children are experiencing pain and show anxiety and sadness. In this study, the more effective distraction techniques between toys and music was compared which will also be necessary to apply to children in the forthcoming. Objectives: 1) To assess the alter pain response by toys as a distraction technique among children receiving immunization. 2) To assess the alter pain response by music as a distraction technique among children receiving immunization. 3) To compare the alter pain responses by toys and music as a distraction technique among children receiving immunization. 4) To associate the alter pain responses with selected demographic variables. Methods and Materials: An interventional research approach was used in this study with experimental research design. 60 samples were selected by Simple Random Sampling Technique. A structured demographic questionnaire and FLACC Pain Scale were used to collect the data. Follow-up period was not required as the response of the pain in both groups were immediately assessed during immunization. Data were analyzed using SPSS Software 22.0 and Chi square was used to find the association between the alter pain responses with demographic variables. Results: The finding shows that the mean score of music was 4.33 with SD of ±1.32 when compared to toys 3.70 with SD of ±1.36. The measured ‘t’ value i.e. 2.07 was less than the tabulated value at 5% level of significance. Therefore, toys were more effective when compared to music as a distraction technique (P<0.05) to alter pain responses among children receiving immunization. There were no association between the alter pain responses with demographic variables. Conclusion: As toys were found to be more effective to alter pain responses than music, a related study can be conducted to compare the alter pain responses between male and female children during immunization. This study recommends that a similar study can be replicated to compare and analyze the distraction techniques between male and female to alter pain responses among children.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Selected Distraction Techniques to Alter Pain Responses among Children Receiving Immunization

Lalzampuii

Maurya

2021

JPRI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These centers are entrusted with the national preventive follow-up program of children that monitors the health and development of children from birth until 18 years. This system sees over 95% of all children born in the Netherlands through a comprehensive series of appointments [52]. Moreover, Lifelines NEXT data could be merged and harmonized with data collected by other cohort studies like the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study (NKPS) [53], the birth cohort studying the prevention and incidence of asthma and mite allergy (PIAMA) [54], Trails NEXT [55] and NeoLifeS [56].…”

Section: Harmonization and External Database Linkagesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lifelines NEXT: a prospective birth cohort adding the next generation to the three-generation Lifelines cohort study

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Epidemiological research has shown there to be a strong relationship between preconceptional, prenatal, birth and earlylife factors and lifelong health. The Lifelines NEXT is a birth cohort designed to study the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic determinants on health and disease in a four-generation design. It is embedded within the Lifelines cohort study, a prospective three-generation population-based cohort study recording the health and health-related aspects of 167,729 individuals living in Northern Netherlands. In Lifelines NEXT we aim to include 1500 pregnant Lifelines participants and intensively follow them, their partners and their children until at least 1 year after birth. Longer-term follow-up of physical and psychological health will then be embedded following Lifelines procedures. During the Lifelines NEXT study period biomaterials-including maternal and neonatal (cord) blood, placental tissue, feces, breast milk, nasal swabs and urine-will be collected from the mother and child at 10 time points. We will also collect data on medical, social, lifestyle and environmental factors via questionnaires at 14 different time points and continuous data via connected devices. The extensive collection of different (bio)materials from mother and child during pregnancy and afterwards will provide the means to relate environmental factors including maternal and neonatal microbiome composition) to (epi)genetics, health and developmental outcomes. The nesting of the study within Lifelines enables us to include preconceptional transgenerational data and can be used to identify other extended families within the cohort.

show abstract

“…Além disso, também foi observado que a técnica de "saturação sensorial" é positiva por fazer uso simultâneo de todos os sentidos -audição, tato, paladar, visão e olfatoesse método pode ser realizado durante a amamentação para gerar aumento do alívio da dor (KAMIRI et al, 2022) Além disso, de acordo com um estudos feitos por Bos-veneman e colaboradores (2018) para analisar a eficácia do aleitamento com fórmula para a dor na vacinação foi percebido que a fórmula não era capaz de reduzir a dor durante a penetração da agulha, mas levava a um esquecimento rápido dessa dor. Contudo, a amamentação se mostrou muito mais eficaz por possuir uma alta concentração de triptofanos e beta endorfinas naturais quando comparado com as fórmulas artificiais, bem como por compilar o contato com a família, o estímulo à sucção, o sabor e a distração (BOS-VENEMAN et al, 2018).…”

Section: Desenvolvimentounclassified

Associação Neurofisiologica Da Amamentação E Do Leite Materno Sobre O Alívio Da Dor Aguda Neonatal Durante a Vacinação: Uma Revisão Integrativa.

Bezerra¹,

Leitão²,

Monteiro³

et al. 2023

Anais Do(a) Anais Do Congresso De Neuro-Fisiologia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using feeding to reduce pain during vaccination of formula-fed infants: a randomised controlled trial

Abstract: IRCTN 31383, post-results.

Cited by 7 publications

References 16 publications

Comparison of Selected Distraction Techniques to Alter Pain Responses among Children Receiving Immunization

Comparison of Selected Distraction Techniques to Alter Pain Responses among Children Receiving Immunization

Lifelines NEXT: a prospective birth cohort adding the next generation to the three-generation Lifelines cohort study

Associação Neurofisiologica Da Amamentação E Do Leite Materno Sobre O Alívio Da Dor Aguda Neonatal Durante a Vacinação: Uma Revisão Integrativa.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About