2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.02.138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phantom somatosensory evoked potentials following selective intraneural electrical stimulation in two amputees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, the following has been concluded from neuroprosthetics research: 1) The most reliable method to extract motion intention for an upper limb from the prosthetic user is to decode the electrical activity of the muscle. [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86] 2) By stimulating the peripheral nerves electrically, [79,80,87] close-to-natural sensations can be provided to the brain including pressure, object shape, stiffness, and texture. [79,80,[87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100] 3) The sensations evoked by nerve-cuff electrodes and interface nerve electrodes are stable for a duration of 24 months.…”
Section: Neuro-stimulation-based Actuatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the following has been concluded from neuroprosthetics research: 1) The most reliable method to extract motion intention for an upper limb from the prosthetic user is to decode the electrical activity of the muscle. [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86] 2) By stimulating the peripheral nerves electrically, [79,80,87] close-to-natural sensations can be provided to the brain including pressure, object shape, stiffness, and texture. [79,80,[87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100] 3) The sensations evoked by nerve-cuff electrodes and interface nerve electrodes are stable for a duration of 24 months.…”
Section: Neuro-stimulation-based Actuatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sensation type, we adapted the questionnaire proposed by Kim et al. [21] based on our experience with several upper limb patients stimulated with invasive [2,9,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31] and non-invasive technologies [12,32]. We also considered other studies on sensations elicited using peripheral [3,29,33] or central [4] neural stimulation approaches.…”
Section: Somatosensory Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the clinical trial we collected feedback information from patients, clinicians and engineers who used the platform presented in this study in three clinical trials (N=12). The investigations regarded the development and assessment of bidirectional hand prostheses for upper limb amputees with a neural sensory feedback delivered by implantable electrodes [9,[26][27][28]31]. After six months of use, we asked participants to answer different quality and usability questions using: questionnaires for user interface satisfaction (QUIS) [37], system usability scales (SUS) [38,39], Nielsen's attributes of usability (NAU) [40] and after-scenario questionnaires (ASQ) [41].…”
Section: Quality and Usability Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a computerized psychophysical testing platform to deliver stimuli and obtain the patient's response, and we statistically analyzed the results. 14 One volunteer participated in receiving "direct" peripheral sensory feedback, 15 and eight volunteer subjects participated in the noninvasive trials.…”
Section: Introduction To the Case-the Epione Research Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%